Camel is wrong, it’s been very close to £300 a few times. Go to hotukdeals.com and search for some of the recent deals that have posted, 2 days ago it went for £312.80 and £306.48 a week ago.Converted to Pounds that is £327.54 plus VAT = £393.05, price in the UK is £399.95
Going by https://uk.camelcamelcamel.com/product/B0815XFSGK?active=summary&tp=all the lowest price it has seen was £393.00
The cost of a i9 10850K looks great in silo. But when you consider the fact that you will need a high end board to overclock or maintain a high level of performance without throttling, it is not cheap at all. On the other hand, you can pair a R7 5800X with even a budget A520 board and it works in most cases.
There is no "AMD lowering prices" here, at least not yet. The drops to MSRP are just supply catching up with demand so retailers and scalpers can't price-gouge people anymore. Retailers have headroom to drop prices some more before they need AMD to lower pricing from its end of the supply chain and AMD won't be doing that until it makes more chips than it can sell at current prices.Some competition is good. Seems like better availability and Rocket Lake/ cheaper Comet Lake may have pushed AMD to start lowering prices.
My local store has had 5600X and 5800X in pretty consistently for the last few weeks. However I’ve not caught a 5900X in stock, but talking to the people back in BYOP they do trickle in. They just go as quickly as they come in. I’ve yet to hear of a 5950X coming in since launch times.$429 at Microcenter if you happen to have one within driving distance.
I find 10th gen Intel to be quite a value considering performance and price. It would be unfair not to also note that 5xxx Ryzen and 11xxx Intel completely kick it's (butt) in IPC.
At the lower end, I'd happily pay the ~$20 premium to get 4.0x16 and NVMe 4.0x4.I find 10th gen Intel to be quite a value considering performance and price.
In the (few) GPU based reviews I have watched on this indicated that at this point it's not a big deal. I completely agree with another statement regarding storage that if you weren't aware of/and had a specific use case for (gen)4 storage that you probably don't need it.At the lower end, I'd happily pay the ~$20 premium to get 4.0x16 and NVMe 4.0x4.
It may not be relevant to enthusiasts rocking GPUs with 8-24GB of VRAM but for more budget-minded people who aren't particularly comfortable with the idea of spending $300+ on a 4GB GPU or $600+ for anything higher, 4.0x16 will be very much needed to make 4GB GPUs workable.
Check out comparisons of the 4GB vs 8GB RX5500 on 4.0x4 vs 3.0x8, 4.0x16 will be a big deal for 4GB GPUs as it allows them to mostly close the gap with their 8GB counterparts. AMD making the RX5500 x8-only was a horrible mistake.In the (few) GPU based reviews I have watched on this indicated that at this point it's not a big deal.
Admittedly, not until very recently were the reviewers even discussing "low end" GPU with the available CPU stack. I would imagine it would be worth my viewing and edification.Check out comparisons of the 4GB vs 8GB RX5500 on 4.0x4 vs 3.0x8, 4.0x16 will be a big deal for 4GB GPUs as it allows them to mostly close the gap with their 8GB counterparts. AMD making the RX5500 x8-only was a horrible mistake.
It may not have been a big deal when 4GB vs 8GB models were only $40 apart on MSRP, just ignore the 4GB models and get a 8GB one, but it is now that they are $300 apart in street pricing.
There is no chance of the RX5xxx series coming down in price since it is made on the same 7nm as other stuff AMD currently makes and I bet AMD reallocated most of the RX5xxx wafers it could to current products.Wish that GTX 1xxx and above or RX 5xxx and above prices would do similar stunt... nah, miners are still high.