How is a 16 or 24 core Epyc 8004 all that different in price from a 7950X system? $200ish for CPU price and the increased price for your RDIMM ECC DDR5 (which you would want in the Epyc 4004, so no difference in cost there) and $150-$200 more for motherboard if it can use a normal ryzen motherboard (there go any hopes for added PCIe lanes though). Is there really a market for that, at most, $400 gap without cannibalizing the lower ends of current Epyc and Threadripper? If it was a successor to the Epyc 3000s, that would be great, but does not appear to be the case. So if you have RDIMM support, more PCIe lanes for cheaper (not sure how you get these without new special and higher cost motherboard, which kills off 50% of potential savings as those new motherboards will rival current Epyc motherboards in price), all you do is shift around revenue from the low end current Epycs and Threadripper to the new Epyc and that is only if it is a real price difference as well as the features mentioned (which is why you go for a Epyc or Threadripper for the most part aside from other features of the Epycs which this would not have if it is based on Ryzen), which frankly is not possible. And if it has all of those features, but with faster clocks and the same power draw as Ryzen, how does that just not put the 8004 line, some of the lower 9004 and lower Threadrippers into the dumpster entirely? So they are going to kill off their high dollar items to give customers a route to massive savings at the expense of their profit line? Right. This will be a rebadged Ryzen with maybe a bell, but no whistle. If it actually exists.