Another Crossfire Rage thread

kevroman

Honorable
Sep 17, 2012
10
0
10,510
Hi everyone,

I've read up on the subject of crossfire and the many issues that may occur, but no post has offered a solution to my CF issue. I hope your insights may shed some light on the matter, so here goes:

This is my setup:
Core i7 870 @ 3.65ghz HT on
8GB Kingston VR DDR3 @1333mhz
Gigabyte GA-P55-USB3 (x16x4)
2xOCZ Agility 3 in Raid0
2x MSI Cyclone HD6850 OC Edition (925/1100) CCC 12.8/CAP2

Al benchmarks show crossfire is operational and gain +70% in score with both cards enabled (despite having an x16x4 interface), however in just about every game, I get negative scaling. There's 2 games where I actually see an increase in performance: Two Worlds 2 (great scaling!) and Battlefield 3 (but the microstutter pretty much ruins that one). My most recent purchase, Guild Wars 2, loses about 35 fps with crossfire enabled, other players seem to be getting great scaling since the release of 12.8 CAP2.

What makes my CF issues bizarre: Whenever a game takes a performance hit with CF enabled (negative scaling) GPU-Z reports higher GPU usage on the second card than the first card (often a large difference, for instance GW2 reports GPU2: 100%, GPU1: 25%). Searching the net I haven't come across anyone who has had a bigger GPU usage on the slave card than on the master card, so I'm guessing something's wrong.

What I've tried so far:
-Replacing the crossfire bridge
-Re-installing/Rolling back drivers
-Remove second card, reinstall drivers, put slave card back in
-Disable ULPS
-Testing both cards seperately
-Praying (hah hah hah, no.)

I'm running out of ideas, anyone got any suggestions? Thanks In advance!

PS: Forgive my poor grammar, I'm from Belgium.
 

kevroman

Honorable
Sep 17, 2012
10
0
10,510
@BigMack70: You make a valid point, this post is literally my last attempt at getting my CF setup to run properly. If this doesn't yield any results it's back to a single GPU.
@ColGeek: I've only recently cranked up the clocks on my GPU & CPU, running at stock speed doesn't make any difference.

Thank you both for your input.
 

COLGeek

Cybernaut
Moderator
Seems from looking at other sites that GW2 has some issues, in particular, with Crossfire configurations and your problem seems to be fairly common.

Since you have already installed 12.8 and CAP 2 the only other thing you can do is make sure GW2 is fully up to date with any available patches.

A single, stronger GPU would certainly solve the CF dilemma.

Good luck!
 

stant1rm

Honorable
Jul 9, 2012
657
0
11,060
Lower end cards are usually responsible for most of the issues people have with CFX. I had amazing performance and perfect scaling with 6970's and little to no microstuttering.
 

stant1rm

Honorable
Jul 9, 2012
657
0
11,060
I don't think all setups have Microstutter, TriFire and TriSLI both seem to have less issues with it. Also, I'm pretty sensitive to Microstutter, I've noticed it my old HD 4850 crossfire rig, my brothers 6870 CFX rig and my friends GTX 560 Ti SLI rig, as well as my GTX 460 SLI rig. But with my old 6970's I didn't notice it at all.
 

kevroman

Honorable
Sep 17, 2012
10
0
10,510
Sidequestion: Is there a tool/registry hack to even out the GPU usage in CF? It seems to put all the load on my second card, the first just hangs around 30%.
Google didn't come up with any results.
 

COLGeek

Cybernaut
Moderator

Not that I am aware of.
 
Quote:
So over the years Multi-GPU support has improved quite a bit, AMD still isn't up-to snuff at the level of NVIDIA though, multi-GPU supports still literally and directly remains the Achilles heel of ATI's Catalyst drivers. For years now we have been requesting user-based multi-GPU profiles. See when a new game comes out, multi-GPU support will not be supported by the Catalyst driver. ATI will always need to update this through drivers or downloadable profiles. What ATI needs to do is to allow the end user to make custom profiles per game. A small tip, renaming your game-executable towards a game title that is supported can, not always but often, help out."
http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/radeon_hd_6850_amp_6870_crossfirex_review,15.html
 

kevroman

Honorable
Sep 17, 2012
10
0
10,510
Reviving an old thread.
Turns out the rumors saying there's no noticable difference between running a x4x16 or x8x8 multi-GPU setup are just plain wrong. At least when it comes to my personal experience.
I bought a new CPU, MoBo and Ram shortly after giving up on getting my old setup to run properly. Currently my setup looks as follows:

Core i7 3820 @ 4.5Ghz
Corsair H80i closed loop water cooler
Asus Sabertooth x79 (PCI-E x16x16x8)
8GB Corsair XMS 7-7-8-20 @ 1666Mhz
2xOCZ Agility 3 in Raid0
2xHD6850 Cyclone Power Edition

Upgrading my motherboard to a full bandwith x16x16 PCI-E beast unlocked the true potential of my 2 HD6850's. I can run anything maxed out without any hiccups, getting great scaling and beating a GTX580 is practically all tests.

So if you're getting unusual bad performance out of your x4x16 Crossfire setup, consider upgrading your motherboard to x8x8 or x16x16 capable one.