I have recently bought a new PC and as you can see from the specs it has the potential to be a pretty kick ass PC. I play games a lot and currently the limiting factor is the graphics card which is the equivalent of an old geforce 2 roughly which is why i have such a low 3DMark score. I would have got a new card along with all my other components but i didnt quite have the moeny. But....i have the money now. Im in the UK and a Radeon 9800 Pro 128mb is £270 while a Geforce FX 5900 (non-ultra) is £280. Im not asking which one is better, unlike many ppl on forums, i do background research and read what ppl think of them. All im interested to know is if you had my PC Setup, what card would you buy seeing as there is little price difference between the two. The Radeon is possible more powerful although im not sure of this due to so many conflicting results. The 5900 candidate is probably going to be made by MSI or Asus as they have the best cooling and game bundle. The Ati is either straight from ATI or from Powercolor or Gigabyte. These don't have much in the way of bundled extras of any kind afaik.
Your insights would be welcome! Oh and if you were going to recommend the 5900 ultra instead, that would cost me over £100 extra on top of either of the other two cards, and im not sure the performance increase (if any) would justify the extra....
2.8ghz Pentium 4 "C"
Asus P4C800 Deluxe Motherboard
1gb Corsair Twinx PC3200
2x 120gb Western Digital (8mb Cache) in RAID 0
Ati Radeon 64mb DDR VIVO
3693 3DMarks (2001 SE Pro)
Your insights would be welcome! Oh and if you were going to recommend the 5900 ultra instead, that would cost me over £100 extra on top of either of the other two cards, and im not sure the performance increase (if any) would justify the extra....
2.8ghz Pentium 4 "C"
Asus P4C800 Deluxe Motherboard
1gb Corsair Twinx PC3200
2x 120gb Western Digital (8mb Cache) in RAID 0
Ati Radeon 64mb DDR VIVO
3693 3DMarks (2001 SE Pro)

