To answer your last question first, yes AA and AF does make most images look better to MOST people.
Here's a few links to help describe them.
AA:
<A HREF="http://babelfish.altavista.com/babelfish/urltrurl?lp=de_en&url=http://www.3dcenter.de/artikel/anti-aliasing/" target="_new">Very detailed, but a little hacked-english from the 3Dcenter</A>
<A HREF="http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/multisamp/" target="_new">Pretty Good Description of Multi vs Super sampling @ Firing Squad</A>
<A HREF="http://www.firingsquad.com/guides/fragmentaa/default.asp" target="_new">FiringSquad explains Fragment AA (as used primarily in Matrox Cards)</A>
<A HREF="http://www.matrox.com/mga/products/tech_info/pdfs/parhelia/faa_16x.pdf" target="_new">MATROX's PDF file with good explination of AA and Fragment AA (nice visuals), of course a little Matrox-centric, not that that's a bad thing

</A>
<A HREF="http://www.visionengineer.com/comp/antialiasing.shtml" target="_new">Another OK explination with a little AF thrown in</A>
AF:
<A HREF="http://www17.tomshardware.com/graphic/20030306/radeon9800pro-07.html" target="_new">THG's quick take as part of a review of the R9800/9600/9200</A>
<A HREF="http://babelfish.altavista.com/babelfish/urltrurl?lp=de_en&url=http://www.3dcenter.de/artikel/grafikfilter/" target="_new">3Dcenter doing a good job again, but it's translated so engrish no best.</A>
<A HREF="http://www.ping.be/powervr/Anisotropic.htm" target="_new">A Quick and simple AF bit from B3D (their link to)</A>
<A HREF="http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,3973,548248,00.asp" target="_new">Extremetech does a good job explaining and comparing</A>
<A HREF="http://www.digit-life.com/articles/digest3d/itogi-video-ani.html" target="_new">Digit Life's USUAL impressive view of things</A>
Hope that helps.
- You need a licence to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp <i>(or internet account)</i> ! <A HREF="http://www.redgreen.com" target="_new"><font color=green>RED</font color=green> <font color=red>GREEN</font color=red></A> GA to SK
