Any good games out there that will really push this Radeon..

G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (More info?)

Hello,

I just upgraded from a Radeon 8500 and I was wondering if anyone knew and
any good games that could really push this new Radeon 9600XT 256. I've got
Unreal Tournament 2003, 2004, & Need for Speed Underground. Any other good
games that show off the new features of DirectX 9 yet?

Thanks,

Jeff
 

Andrew

Distinguished
Mar 31, 2004
2,439
0
19,780
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (More info?)

On Sat, 3 Apr 2004 09:10:42 -0500, "Jeff M. Ingram"
<jingram@hotmail.com> wrote:

>I just upgraded from a Radeon 8500 and I was wondering if anyone knew and
>any good games that could really push this new Radeon 9600XT 256. I've got
>Unreal Tournament 2003, 2004, & Need for Speed Underground. Any other good
>games that show off the new features of DirectX 9 yet?

Far Cry will bring it to its knees.
--
Andrew. To email unscramble nrc@gurjevgrzrboivbhf.pbz & remove spamtrap.
Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim messages to quote only relevent text.
Check groups.google.com before asking a question.
 

zulu

Distinguished
Apr 3, 2004
223
0
18,680
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (More info?)

"Jeff M. Ingram" <jingram@hotmail.com> skrev i en meddelelse
news:c4mgkt$1ov4$1@news3.infoave.net...
> Hello,
>
> I just upgraded from a Radeon 8500 and I was wondering if anyone knew and
> any good games that could really push this new Radeon 9600XT 256. I've
got
> Unreal Tournament 2003, 2004, & Need for Speed Underground. Any other
good
> games that show off the new features of DirectX 9 yet?

Far Cry can bring most PC's to it's knees...

Far Cry in 1600x1200 is nice... :)

Zulu
 

Bax

Distinguished
Mar 31, 2004
6
0
18,510
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (More info?)

Flight Simulator 2004.

(top posted by choice)

"Andrew" <spamtrap@localhost> wrote in message
news:8cit60lbq7pguskg5pmbi279ki0kb3phnr@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 3 Apr 2004 09:10:42 -0500, "Jeff M. Ingram"
> <jingram@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >I just upgraded from a Radeon 8500 and I was wondering if anyone knew and
> >any good games that could really push this new Radeon 9600XT 256. I've
got
> >Unreal Tournament 2003, 2004, & Need for Speed Underground. Any other
good
> >games that show off the new features of DirectX 9 yet?
>
> Far Cry will bring it to its knees.
> --
> Andrew. To email unscramble nrc@gurjevgrzrboivbhf.pbz & remove spamtrap.
> Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
> please don't top post. Trim messages to quote only relevent text.
> Check groups.google.com before asking a question.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (More info?)

>«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»

Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim messages to quote only relevent text.
Check groups.google.com before asking a question.

>«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»

Trying to play net-cop are we, giving people your rules are you, seen
thousands like you come and go over the last 20 years on the USENET.

Try to behave yourself, and anyone from any planet in any language can
answer any question in the whole universe by saying ' google', it's a
cop out used by people who don't know the answer.

The reason people use this community is because they need an anwer,
usually they will have exhausted all their ideas before they get to
this place - sending them away is not helping but abdication,
abandoning them by sending to 'google', it's not helpful.

To anyone other than Andrew reading this, ask what you want, when you
want, and how you want, and ignore self appointed net-cop's whoever
they may be.

BoroLad
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (More info?)

Sorry I am off topic here but... Well said BoroLad. I concur.


--end
borolad@myowseintheboro.org wrote:
>
> >«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»
>
> Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
> please don't top post. Trim messages to quote only relevent text.
> Check groups.google.com before asking a question.
>
> >«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»
>
> Trying to play net-cop are we, giving people your rules are you, seen
> thousands like you come and go over the last 20 years on the USENET.
>
> Try to behave yourself, and anyone from any planet in any language can
> answer any question in the whole universe by saying ' google', it's a
> cop out used by people who don't know the answer.
>
> The reason people use this community is because they need an anwer,
> usually they will have exhausted all their ideas before they get to
> this place - sending them away is not helping but abdication,
> abandoning them by sending to 'google', it's not helpful.
>
> To anyone other than Andrew reading this, ask what you want, when you
> want, and how you want, and ignore self appointed net-cop's whoever
> they may be.
>
> BoroLad
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (More info?)

On 4/3/2004 11:49 AM Danny Greaves brightened our day with:

>Sorry I am off topic here but... Well said BoroLad. I concur.
>
>
>-
>

Two plonks for the price of one, morons.

--
"Cocaine's a hell of a drug" - Rick James

Steve [Inglo]
 

blah

Distinguished
Dec 31, 2007
2,694
0
20,780
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (More info?)

"Jeff M. Ingram" <jingram@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:c4mgkt$1ov4$1@news3.infoave.net...
> Hello,
>
> I just upgraded from a Radeon 8500 and I was wondering if anyone knew and
> any good games that could really push this new Radeon 9600XT 256. I've
got
> Unreal Tournament 2003, 2004, & Need for Speed Underground. Any other
good
> games that show off the new features of DirectX 9 yet?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jeff
>

errr. not hard to bog down your card. Just crank up the resolutions etc...
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (More info?)

Try Far Cry.

--
DaveW



"Jeff M. Ingram" <jingram@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:c4mgkt$1ov4$1@news3.infoave.net...
> Hello,
>
> I just upgraded from a Radeon 8500 and I was wondering if anyone knew and
> any good games that could really push this new Radeon 9600XT 256. I've
got
> Unreal Tournament 2003, 2004, & Need for Speed Underground. Any other
good
> games that show off the new features of DirectX 9 yet?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jeff
>
>
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (More info?)

On Sat, 3 Apr 2004 09:10:42 -0500, "Jeff M. Ingram"
<jingram@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Hello,
>
>I just upgraded from a Radeon 8500 and I was wondering if anyone knew and
>any good games that could really push this new Radeon 9600XT 256. I've got
>Unreal Tournament 2003, 2004, & Need for Speed Underground. Any other good
>games that show off the new features of DirectX 9 yet?
>

1. Far Cry
2. Far Cry
3. Far Cry
4. Far Cry.
....................

.............. since you can play with the graphics options to your
heart's content in the Customize Option of the Configuration tool.
( The V1.1 patch even supports the soon-to-be-released NV40
and PS3.0. )

You can also bring your CPU to its knees when you zoom
the binoculars --- watch the CPU temp rocket up and the
frame-rate fall. Of course, worse at higher resolutions.

Great fun..... thanks Cryek for the most comprehensive real-live
PC CPU/Video performance benchmark ever. All graphics settings
in Far Cry can be recorded and documented for system-comparison
purposes.

As for your 9600XT 256... I can probably send you some
paper hankies...........

John Lewis


John Lewis

>Thanks,
>
>Jeff
>
>
 

Andrew

Distinguished
Mar 31, 2004
2,439
0
19,780
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (More info?)

On Sat, 03 Apr 2004 19:23:51 +0100, borolad@myowseintheboro.org wrote:

>Trying to play net-cop are we, giving people your rules are you, seen
>thousands like you come and go over the last 20 years on the USENET.

You are the one who is playing netcop. What I have in my .sig (that is
formed within accepted standards) is up to me. If people want to read
it, that is down to them.
--
Andrew. To email unscramble nrc@gurjevgrzrboivbhf.pbz & remove spamtrap.
Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim messages to quote only relevent text.
Check groups.google.com before asking a question.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (More info?)

On Sun, 4 Apr 2004 13:53:40 +0100, "patrickp"
<patrickp@5acoustibop.co.uk - take five to email me> wrote:

«----»«----»«----»«----»«----»«----»«----»«----»«----»«----»

>Couldn't agree with you more, BoroLad. The other thing that people are
>always flaming for is poor spelling or English (or, presumably, whatever
>language happens to be the medium). My take is that anyone who gets upset
>about posting rules, grammar, spelling etc, is just going to miss out on on
>a lot of help, information, fun and generally nice people. Well, if you
>_want_ to be a loser...

>The only things I don't like to see on Usenet are excessive bad language and
>pointless political (in the loosest sense, as in threads I've seen here)
>debates in groups where they're not appropriate. Both those contradict what
>I see as the basic rule of Usenet: respect the people you're talking with,
>at least until they demonstrate their unworthiness by disrespecting others.

>patrickp

«----»«----»«----»«----»«----»«----»«----»«----»«----»«----»

My spelling as many will agree is pretty dismal, partly due that is to
my government insistence on implimenting the ' Euro-English' clause
in the recent negotiations with Brussels. For those who don't know
this incremental plan I reproduce as follows :

"The European Commission has just announced an agreement whereby
English will be the official language of the European nation rather
than German which was the other possibility.

As part of the negotiations, Her Majesty's Government conceded that
English spelling had some room for improvement and has accepted a
5-year phase-in plan that would become known as "Euro-English"

In the first year, "s" will replace the soft "c". Sertainly, this will
make the sivil servants jump with joy. The hard "c" will be dropped in
favour of the "k". This should klear up konfusion, and keyboards kan
have one less letter.

There will be growing publik enthusiasm in the sekond year when the
troublesome "ph" will be replaced with the "f". This will make words
like fotograf 20% shorter.

In the 3rd year, publik akseptanse of the new spelling kan be expekted
to reach the stage where more komplikated changes are possible.
Governments will enkourage the removal of double letters which have
always ben a deterent to akurate speling. Also, al wil agre that the
horibl mes of the silent "e" in the languag is disgrasful and it
should go away.

By the 4th yer peopl wil be reseptiv to steps such as replasing "th"
with "z" and "w" with "v". During ze fifz yer, ze unesesary "o" kan
be dropd from vords kontaining "ou" and after ziz fifz yer, ve vil hav
a reil sensibl riten styl. Zer vil be no mor trubl or difikultis and
evrivun vil find it ezi tu understand ech oza. Ze drem of a united
urop vil finali kum tru".

Hopi zis mad yu smil, patrickp !

BoroLad
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (More info?)

<borolad@myowseintheboro.org> wrote in message
news:3c40705q49soku1nqmr3rv08qiei784r8m@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 4 Apr 2004 13:53:40 +0100, "patrickp"
> <patrickp@5acoustibop.co.uk - take five to email me> wrote:
>
> «----»«----»«----»«----»«----»«----»«----»«----»«----»«----»
>
> >Couldn't agree with you more, BoroLad. The other thing that people are
> >always flaming for is poor spelling or English (or, presumably, whatever
> >language happens to be the medium). My take is that anyone who gets
upset
> >about posting rules, grammar, spelling etc, is just going to miss out on
on
> >a lot of help, information, fun and generally nice people. Well, if you
> >_want_ to be a loser...
>
> >The only things I don't like to see on Usenet are excessive bad language
and
> >pointless political (in the loosest sense, as in threads I've seen here)
> >debates in groups where they're not appropriate. Both those contradict
what
> >I see as the basic rule of Usenet: respect the people you're talking
with,
> >at least until they demonstrate their unworthiness by disrespecting
others.
>
> >patrickp
>
> «----»«----»«----»«----»«----»«----»«----»«----»«----»«----»
>
> My spelling as many will agree is pretty dismal, partly due that is to
> my government insistence on implimenting the ' Euro-English' clause
> in the recent negotiations with Brussels. For those who don't know
> this incremental plan I reproduce as follows :
>
> "The European Commission has just announced an agreement whereby
> English will be the official language of the European nation rather
> than German which was the other possibility.
>
> As part of the negotiations, Her Majesty's Government conceded that
> English spelling had some room for improvement and has accepted a
> 5-year phase-in plan that would become known as "Euro-English"
>
> In the first year, "s" will replace the soft "c". Sertainly, this will
> make the sivil servants jump with joy. The hard "c" will be dropped in
> favour of the "k". This should klear up konfusion, and keyboards kan
> have one less letter.
>
> There will be growing publik enthusiasm in the sekond year when the
> troublesome "ph" will be replaced with the "f". This will make words
> like fotograf 20% shorter.
>
> In the 3rd year, publik akseptanse of the new spelling kan be expekted
> to reach the stage where more komplikated changes are possible.
> Governments will enkourage the removal of double letters which have
> always ben a deterent to akurate speling. Also, al wil agre that the
> horibl mes of the silent "e" in the languag is disgrasful and it
> should go away.
>
> By the 4th yer peopl wil be reseptiv to steps such as replasing "th"
> with "z" and "w" with "v". During ze fifz yer, ze unesesary "o" kan
> be dropd from vords kontaining "ou" and after ziz fifz yer, ve vil hav
> a reil sensibl riten styl. Zer vil be no mor trubl or difikultis and
> evrivun vil find it ezi tu understand ech oza. Ze drem of a united
> urop vil finali kum tru".
>
> Hopi zis mad yu smil, patrickp !
>
> BoroLad

Er, you weren't swearing there, were you, bl? ;-)

patrickp
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (More info?)

On Sat, 3 Apr 2004 09:10:42 -0500, "Jeff M. Ingram"
<jingram@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Hello,
>
>I just upgraded from a Radeon 8500 and I was wondering if anyone knew and
>any good games that could really push this new Radeon 9600XT 256. I've got
>Unreal Tournament 2003, 2004, & Need for Speed Underground. Any other good
>games that show off the new features of DirectX 9 yet?

A few bucks more could have been a 9800non pro or 9800Pro ($200~220)
instead...

UT2004 can bring my 9800Pro pretty low. On HUGE outdoor maps with out
20+ bots, max details .... in 1600x1200 AA turned on (not FA) and I'm
in the mid 30s. But indoors, I'm back into the 50s.

The 9800Pro is still a good card... but in another 12 months, a
9800PRO equaled powered card should be about $100.


--
Remember when real men used Real computers!?
When 512K of video RAM was a lot!

Death to Palladium & WPA!!
 

Andrew

Distinguished
Mar 31, 2004
2,439
0
19,780
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (More info?)

On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 10:00:14 +1200, "Daykin2k" <daykin2k@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>i also wonder how halo does on the 9600xt, i hear its quite demanding and
>even slow on a 9800xt!

It runs just fine on my 9700 Pro with all eye candy on.
--
Andrew. To email unscramble nrc@gurjevgrzrboivbhf.pbz & remove spamtrap.
Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim messages to quote only relevant text.
Check groups.google.com before asking a question.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (More info?)

On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 05:44:13 +0100, Andrew <spamtrap@localhost> wrote:

>On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 10:00:14 +1200, "Daykin2k" <daykin2k@hotmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>i also wonder how halo does on the 9600xt, i hear its quite demanding and
>>even slow on a 9800xt!
True

it can go down to 10 fps if your using A4x fa8x

with all on at 1024X768X32
>It runs just fine on my 9700 Pro with all eye candy on.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (More info?)

borolad@myowseintheboro.org wrote:
>>«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»
>
>
> Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
> please don't top post. Trim messages to quote only relevent text.
> Check groups.google.com before asking a question.
>
>
>>«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»
>
>
> Trying to play net-cop are we, giving people your rules are you, seen
> thousands like you come and go over the last 20 years on the USENET.
>
> Try to behave yourself, and anyone from any planet in any language can
> answer any question in the whole universe by saying ' google', it's a
> cop out used by people who don't know the answer.
>
> The reason people use this community is because they need an anwer,
> usually they will have exhausted all their ideas before they get to
> this place - sending them away is not helping but abdication,
> abandoning them by sending to 'google', it's not helpful.
>
> To anyone other than Andrew reading this, ask what you want, when you
> want, and how you want, and ignore self appointed net-cop's whoever
> they may be.
>
> BoroLad

You know, I've never understood this adversion to top-posting. I don't
know about others, but when I'm reading the 55th message in a thread,
(having just read the 54th), why should I need to scroll down thru
everything I just read in the last message to get to what the 55th
poster said?? In top-posting, it's right there - I can read it and move
on to 56. Anyway, no matter what the "policically correct" way is to
post, somebody's gonna do it the other way, so why don't we just give in
and realize that Eutopia is a long way off?
 

Gonzo

Distinguished
Apr 2, 2004
110
0
18,680
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (More info?)

I have never understood it either... :eek:)

"Steve Henderson" <shenderson_2@charter.net> wrote in message
news:10929teh3rc7n42@corp.supernews.com...
> borolad@myowseintheboro.org wrote:
> >>«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»
> >
> >
> > Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
> > please don't top post. Trim messages to quote only relevent text.
> > Check groups.google.com before asking a question.
> >
> >
> >>«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»«snip»
> >
> >
> > Trying to play net-cop are we, giving people your rules are you, seen
> > thousands like you come and go over the last 20 years on the USENET.
> >
> > Try to behave yourself, and anyone from any planet in any language can
> > answer any question in the whole universe by saying ' google', it's a
> > cop out used by people who don't know the answer.
> >
> > The reason people use this community is because they need an anwer,
> > usually they will have exhausted all their ideas before they get to
> > this place - sending them away is not helping but abdication,
> > abandoning them by sending to 'google', it's not helpful.
> >
> > To anyone other than Andrew reading this, ask what you want, when you
> > want, and how you want, and ignore self appointed net-cop's whoever
> > they may be.
> >
> > BoroLad
>
> You know, I've never understood this adversion to top-posting. I don't
> know about others, but when I'm reading the 55th message in a thread,
> (having just read the 54th), why should I need to scroll down thru
> everything I just read in the last message to get to what the 55th
> poster said?? In top-posting, it's right there - I can read it and move
> on to 56. Anyway, no matter what the "policically correct" way is to
> post, somebody's gonna do it the other way, so why don't we just give in
> and realize that Eutopia is a long way off?