Archived from groups: alt.games.video.nintendo.gameboy.advance (
More info?)
On Mon, 17 May 2004 10:16:05 -0400, p_conrad wrote:
> On Sun, 16 May 2004 23:23:50 -0700, Preston Crawford
> <me@REMOVESPAMBLOCKprestoncrawford.com> wrote:
>
>>I've played pretty much everything there is to play and I'm running out of
>>stuff to play. I'm a HUGE fan of Strat/Tactical RPGs and I'm wondering if
>>this game is better than the reviews give it credit for.
>>
>>Preston
>
>
> It's fairly boring. The game doesn't even feature facing. The
> special attacks don't seem to special, and it looks terrible all the
> time.
That's what I was afraid someone was going to say.
> If you already played Tactics Ogre, Fire Emblem, Final Fantasy
> Tactics, and even the slightly out of genre Advance Wars games, maybe
> you might want to give it a look. I'd be more inclined to try the
> Megaman Battle Network games, or even the Yu-Gi-Oh! and Pokemon games
> before resorting to Onimusha Tactics. Even the very weak Eye of the
> Beholder for GBA is a little better than OT.
Yeah, I have Pokemon and I'm going to start that soon. I'm playing Advance
Wars 2 right now. So I guess I'm just trying to collect more games worth
playing since the writing on the wall from E3 is that the GBA is an
abandoned platform.
> Of course, if you have a PS2, you can just play Disgaea and La
Pucell
> for pretty much the rest of your life. Granted it's not portable, but
> going places is over-rated.
Well, my problem is I don't really have the time to sit down and play
RPGs. That's why portable RPGs work better for me. I'd love to play those
above games and have considered getting a PS2 just for them, but I just
can't see myself spending the requisite time in front of my TV playing
them.
Preston