sundragon
Distinguished
apple always picks the weakest opponent to compare themselves to. People are sour, because fanboys were promising 4000% faster stuff...
m2 performance cannot grow much because its not CISK, its only gaining when you add cores or shrink nodes. I am 99% sure 18% gain comes from wider memory access that DDR5 provides. M2 is in same ballpark as alder lake, so it will be much slower than raptor & 7'th mobile amd, not even talking about desktop variants.
AMD 6'th offers up to 24h of battery life, and were tested to provide 17 on youtube watching. So whole m2 is not as revolutionary as first one, as its not compared to 6 y old (intel) tech as m1 was...
I remind you when m1 launched, they compared themselves to "most sold laptop on amazon" which at the time was 269$ Athlon based thing...
They made intel <Mod Edit> themselves when both AMD launched zen1 and apple shown m1... but now x86 is going faster with every generation and arm stuff will be even more behind speed wise.
I agree power usage is something to be envied about, but when they will be losing performance wars, they will as well make power sucking monsters...
Funny you mention shenanigans in benchmarks... HOWEVER
I have 20+ hours of work life in my MacBook Pro and it executes faster than my previous Intel MacBook 2016 that was fast when it hit launched. I will repeat, I CURRENTLY have a 12th gen Intel workstation laptop for my new job and the comparison to my work Intel chipset laptop is that it runs about the same speed at the same tasks but it's dead in ~8 hours if I'm lucky 😆
You can keep making arguments to the people on this forum that don't own the hardware... 🤣