I need to buy some thermal paste regarding which I have a few questions.
I can't decide between Arctic MX-4 and Antec Formula 7.
I will be applying it as shown here
http://archive.benchmarkreviews.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=170&Itemid=38&limitstart=5
using the 2 line method on my CM Hyper TX-3 EVO
1. Which of the two performs better?
2. I have read that the Formula 7 is very thick and difficult to spread.
Will it spread evenly and give good results on my Hyper TX3 using the line method?
3. The MX-4 is rated as 8.5W/mK whereas the Formula 7 is 8.3W/mK. Does that mean that it's
better?
4. The MX-4 is rated to last 8 years while for this user, it was wearing out after 4 months.
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?285968-Arctic-MX-4-Lacks-Longevity
This user also had very high load temperatures with the MX-4
http://www.overclock.net/t/1365212/3-eah6970-with-arctic-mx4-thermal-paste-vs-antec-formula-7-nano-diamond-thermal-compound
Both will cost me the same amount, so please help me decide.
Thanks.
I can't decide between Arctic MX-4 and Antec Formula 7.
I will be applying it as shown here
http://archive.benchmarkreviews.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=170&Itemid=38&limitstart=5
using the 2 line method on my CM Hyper TX-3 EVO
1. Which of the two performs better?
2. I have read that the Formula 7 is very thick and difficult to spread.
Will it spread evenly and give good results on my Hyper TX3 using the line method?
3. The MX-4 is rated as 8.5W/mK whereas the Formula 7 is 8.3W/mK. Does that mean that it's
better?
4. The MX-4 is rated to last 8 years while for this user, it was wearing out after 4 months.
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?285968-Arctic-MX-4-Lacks-Longevity
This user also had very high load temperatures with the MX-4
http://www.overclock.net/t/1365212/3-eah6970-with-arctic-mx4-thermal-paste-vs-antec-formula-7-nano-diamond-thermal-compound
Both will cost me the same amount, so please help me decide.
Thanks.