ASMedia Developing 10 GB/s USB 3.5 Controllers

Status
Not open for further replies.

unknown9122

Honorable
Jun 2, 2012
136
0
10,680
0
Good stuff. Thunderbolt is the future. But the flatness of the USB port allows for thinner PCs. The thunderbolt port has more vertical length.
 

bison88

Distinguished
May 24, 2009
618
0
18,980
0
Thunderbolt is hardly the future. It is no longer optical which makes it less different than USB. Not to mention Intel held back proper USB 3.0 support from the market intentionally for over 2 years in an effort to push Thunderbolt, their tech, as a "new" USB replacement that was unnecessary.
 

dgingeri

Distinguished
Dec 4, 2009
2,123
1
20,460
212
Now if they can just make the UAS features standard on USB 3.5 and make it more efficient for storage, that would make it near equal to Thunderbolt. As it is, USB 3.0 only comes close to TB if UAS is used. USB 3.0 has too much baggage from 1.1 and 2.0 to be efficient enough for regular use.
 

WithoutWeakness

Honorable
Nov 7, 2012
311
0
10,810
15


Thunderbolt is likely not the future. The concept of Thunderbolt (using external PCIe lanes) may be the future but Thunderbolt in its current iterations are certainly not. Thunderbolt hasn't become widely adopted because of the ubiquity of USB devices. If I buy an external hard drive I'm going to buy a USB 3.0 drive because I know I can plug it into any machine made in the last 15 years, even an old beige tower with USB 1.1 ports. Thunderbolt drives are only going to work on the newest and most expensive machines and offer minimal speed improvements over USB 3.0 for single drives. If a USB 3.5 solution can provide Thunderbolt-like speeds while still maintaining backwards compatibility with previous USB standards then it may be the better solution for users requiring faster external devices.
 

Vorador2

Distinguished
Jun 26, 2007
464
3
18,785
0
Thunderbolt is too pricey, both chipsets and cables. It has it's advantages, but most people can do with usb 3.0 nicely.

TB only shines where very high speed is critical, like external graphic cards.
 

Grandmastersexsay

Honorable
May 16, 2013
332
0
10,780
0
I am trying to understand the point of this. What kind of device will be able to take advantage of such speeds? The fastest SSDs can only do slightly bettet than 500 MB/s or 4 Gb/s. We probably won't see those kind of speeds on comercially available storage medium for 5-10 years. I suppose this could be used for video, but display port's bandwidth is nearly double this already at over 17 Gb/s.
 

jn77

Distinguished
Feb 14, 2007
587
0
18,990
2
Thunderbolt will go like firewire, the problem is in real world bandwidth tests fireware always came close to spec where USB never even met spec, what ever the max spec has been. I would like to see a firewire 256,000 instead of firewire 1600.
 


Although the widespread use of USB is part of the equation. The bigger problem is that Thunderbolt cables and compatible products are so darn expensive. It seems to add $100 onto the USB counterpart for any peripheral. External docks and PCI-e enclosures costing more than really high end gaming motherboards. Small RAID enclosures running $700 or a whole lot more. Then add $50 a cable. It has priced itself out of the running.

One of the most ridiculous points is the expensive cable needing chips at each end. They need to refine the technology so that regular chip free cables work.
 

danwat1234

Distinguished
Jun 13, 2008
1,392
0
19,310
9


It won't help mechanical drives connected to USB3.5 because the mechanical drive itself it the bottleneck at something less than 200MB/s. SSDs on the other hand, sure. Hybrid drives may eventually be able to take advantage of it too
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ASK THE COMMUNITY

TRENDING THREADS