Asus teases its first ever 27-inch OLED gaming monitor, featuring a 240 Hz refresh rate and a 1440p resolution.
Asus Teases Its First 27-Inch, OLED Gaming Monitor : Read more
Asus Teases Its First 27-Inch, OLED Gaming Monitor : Read more
hopefully the monitor's price - which will likely be very expensive.
So this will probably be a marginal improvement over LG's own model that only hits 200 nits peak brightness.
Why do companies keep making this silly resolution? Where are the normal, 27" or 28" oled 4k 240Hz? Not the ultrawide or curved crap btw.
27 inch? But why? Do people really use those tiny little things? Give me at least 32 or ah heck off.
And at least 2k (2560). Kinda silly to have a huge lowres (1920) monitor.
4K? Give me at least 55 inch. My eyes just can't deal with icons that require a microscope.
Yes I feel the same way as some others here. 27 inches is so archaic. Obviously, it is subjective. But that is just my opinion. I don't really care about 1080p anymore. And 1440p I only use on rare occasions. I've been using 4K TVs because they're cheaper to game on than a monitor but it would be nice to see a 4K monitor that's high refresh that's a reasonable price.
I don't really understand how 60-inch 4K TVs can be cheap but you can't get a cheap 32 inch gaming monitor.
I understand that OLEDs will be dimmer than backlit monitors and I'm not just disappointed by the brightness in comparison to LCDs. 200 nits at 25% APL SDR is low even compared to other OLEDs with similar pixel density and aperture ratios. Sony's 42" OLED gets 50% brighter in the same conditions and is nearly identical in terms of PPI.This one is the best. It's one of those "look how smart I am" comments that fundamentally betrays an actual lack of understanding about a given tech. OLED monitors will never hit the same peak brightness at the same screen size as backlit monitors, how in the hell would you think other wise? This is coupled with the fact that it can turn off individual pixels, so it doesn't even need to hit the same nits to produce absurdly better contrast.
The LG version of this panel is $1000 and the Asus sure won't be cheaper. Most people aren't spending that much on a monitor and if they are I sure hope they're spending similar amounts or more on their GPU.The only thing that can push 4k at any where near acceptable frames is a 4090, which most people don't have, so what in the world is the need for a 4k high refresh screen?
I'm not sure you understand the tech that well, either. Power delivery is the main problem. Why else do you think an LG C1 OLED can sustain over 700 nits in a small white box anywhere but drops to 130 nits when that box expands to the full display? Heck, decent OLED phone displays have been able to sustain 600 nits over a full 6" diagonal for years, right?This one is the best. It's one of those "look how smart I am" comments that fundamentally betrays an actual lack of understanding about a given tech. OLED monitors will never hit the same peak brightness at the same screen size as backlit monitors, how in the hell would you think other wise?
Actually your semi incorrect, for something to actually be military grade (not fake military grade) it generally has extremely rigid testing requirements that far exceed typical consumer gear. Electronics for instance generally have redundancies and much much higher protection against interference and environmental issues.I'm sure it will it is a gaming display. Mostly a meaningless term like military grade, all it does is add to the price.
He's not talking about actual military grade products. Jump on Amazon and search for military grade. You will get results ranging from socks to bicycle locks and cell phone cases to glow sticks, none of them actual military grade. What on earth is a military grade glow stick? Military grade attached to all of those products is meaningless and just a way to charge more for nothing.Actually your semi incorrect, for something to actually be military grade (not fake military grade) it generally has extremely rigid testing requirements that far exceed typical consumer gear. Electronics for instance generally have redundancies and much much higher protection against interference and environmental issues.
But generally this stuff is very low volume thus making it massively more expensive, also manufacturers ripping people off.
27" is a lil small for all those 4K pixels, would be best served for 32.Why do companies keep making this silly resolution? Where are the normal, 27" or 28" oled 4k 240Hz? Not the ultrawide or curved crap btw.