Review Asus TUF Gaming Z590-Plus WIFI Review: TUF Enough

Co BIY

Honorable
Jun 18, 2015
568
102
11,190
7
I enjoy these midrange reviews because these are boards I may actually be in the market for. The tradeoffs between the options are interesting.

I think the tables with the "best" board on the bottom are confusing . The "best" should be at the top even when that means it has a lower number.

And why is the MSI MEG Ace always at the top regardless of it's performance in a given test ? ( I don't think Tom's would sell top billing on every table regardless of scores - Especially when the top is sometimes the worst spot the way the tables are set.)
 
Reactions: Howardohyea

Howardohyea

Proper
May 13, 2021
228
55
170
2
I enjoy these midrange reviews because these are boards I may actually be in the market for.
I just read those reviews for fun, it is interesting to see different boards with different perks/aspects.

It might be me though but I really would like to see a CMOS clear button on the rear IO, or have the CMOS battery not blocked under a graphics card
 

MainFramR1

Commendable
Feb 22, 2019
1
1
1,510
0
I enjoy these midrange reviews because these are boards I may actually be in the market for. The tradeoffs between the options are interesting.

I think the tables with the "best" board on the bottom are confusing . The "best" should be at the top even when that means it has a lower number.

And why is the MSI MEG Ace always at the top regardless of it's performance in a given test ? ( I don't think Tom's would sell top billing on every table regardless of scores - Especially when the top is sometimes the worst spot the way the tables are set.)
The top result in the charts is always the same and a reference for the 10900K versus the 11900K (AMD reviews its a 3900X). In other words, it's not the board, but the CPU used as a reference and is not included in the performance sort.
 
Reactions: Co BIY

ASK THE COMMUNITY