Athlon 3200+ Faster then P4 3.0C

Kemche

Distinguished
Oct 5, 2001
284
0
18,780
Actual quote is...

<b>
"As additional evidence that performance is not based on megahertz alone: the 3200+ operates at a frequency of 2.2GHz yet can outperform an Intel Pentium 4 processor operating at 3.0GHz with an 800 FSB and HyperThreading on a broad array of real-world applications," states AMD.
</b>

<A HREF="http://www.newsfactor.com/perl/story/21963.html" target="_new">Link</A>

Should I send them link to all the website which has a different point of view.

KG

"Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity." - Sarah Chambers
 

sabbath1

Distinguished
Apr 4, 2003
460
0
18,780
Do that :wink:
AMD has been so full of lies lately, just starting to improve. Don't trust any company, folks!

My system: Intel Pentium 4 3.0, 800FSB / TwinMOS 1Gb DDR400 / MSI 875P Neo / Sapphire Radeon 9800Pro / Antec TruePower 550W / 2x Western Digital Raptor / Hercules G.T XP /
SamsungDVD / Lite-On CDRW
 

eden

Champion
Post me graphics and gaming benches so I can believe you.

--
<A HREF="http://www.lochel.com/THGC/html/news.html" target="_new"><font color=purple><b>The official Tom's Hardware Guide Forums Photo Album, click here to contribute!</font color=purple></b></A>
 

eden

Champion
adding that Intel's HyperThreading technology "completely skews the numbers yet again."
I give AMD a couple of months before declaring all happily "The new Athlon 64 [insert horse name here] brings to the table a wealth of new features including Hyper-Threading, delivering earth-shattering new heights of performance taylored for Graphics and Movie editing enthusiasts, as well as the home media user."

--
<A HREF="http://www.lochel.com/THGC/html/news.html" target="_new"><font color=purple><b>The official Tom's Hardware Guide Forums Photo Album, click here to contribute!</font color=purple></b></A>