Athlon X3 450 vs FX 4300

HSH85

Reputable
Oct 3, 2015
10
0
4,510
Hi TH' readers,

Yesterday I bought myself a 750 Ti 2GB as an upgrade from my old HD 5670 512MB. Both cards draw the same power from the PCI slot so it's a great upgrade for a low-power mid-range card. My concern is that the graphics performance may be bottleneck by my old Athlon X3 450. So I was wondering if I should upgrade to a FX 4300 to increase the graphics performance for my new graphics card.

Note: the X3 450 has a defunct 4th core; so that rules out the core unlocker.

Thank you.
 
Solution
In newer games the FX 6300 is 7% to 13% better. But after looking at the prices in the UK I don't think it's worth it to go with the FX 6300 because you will pay 43% more for 13% better performance. In the US the FX 6300 only costs 16% more than the FX 4300.


Yeah I have a AM3+ board:
https://www.asus.com/Motherboards/M5A78LM_LX/
I need to update the bios to install the FX brand.

Is £20 extra worth to buy the 6300 over the 4300. How much performance gains between the two to justify the extra 20 pounds?
Thank you for responding?

Edit:
http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/answers/id-2388281/fx4300-fx6300.html
This thread shows the difference. Interesting. I may save a bit for the 6300...
 
In newer games the FX 6300 is 7% to 13% better. But after looking at the prices in the UK I don't think it's worth it to go with the FX 6300 because you will pay 43% more for 13% better performance. In the US the FX 6300 only costs 16% more than the FX 4300.
 
Solution


Thank you. I guess I go for the 4300 then. :)