IF you actually look at the benches, the cost, the physical specs of the cards, nvidia loses on
all fronts. I'm talking overall not "ooo nvidia gtx280 beat 4870CF in oblivian at 2560x1600" The
4850 nips on the heels of the gtx260 in several places, sure the gtx260 is faster overall, but
you can't ignore the fact that the 4850 has 384 megs less ram, both are running gddr3, and the
4850 debuted at less than half the cost.
But then you have the 4870, outdoes the gtx260 in almost every, single card comparison, still
384megs less ram, though uses the more expensive lower supplyed GDDR5...yet debuted at $300, $150
less then the gtx260. But then it also creeps up to compare with the gtx280 in several benches,
beats it in more then one...with a full 512mb less ram, and $300-400 less than the gtx280 at
it's debut.
My i bet nvidia is thrilled they snuck their gtx200 release those few days ahead of ATI.I mean
what could possibly be worse than a 6month delay and the competition beating your release with
such good price's and performance? Oh, yes.. unvieling your new cards to reviews that already
note the small performance gains at high price premiums compared with previous gen, then ya
know...the thing that actually happened.
But if the single card comparisons aren't enough to sway you, there's always xfire and sli.
Despite the 2x4850 CF benches being definitive enough, ya know, ya just got to measure everything
up. So lets see the 4850CF wins out over over not only the 260 by a fair margin, but the gtx280
in crysis, call of duty 4, Bioshock, assasains creed. STALKER and many more in the max bench
resolutions of 1920x1200 and 2560x1600 depending on title. I find it interesting that the 4850CF
out did the gtx280 in crysis in 1920x1200 with very high settings. In fact the 4870 beats the
gtx280 in 1920x1200 on med settings, 1280x1024 on high settings, and is only 1.9 fps slower in
1920x1200 with very high settings.But i of course have been reading numerous reviews, and since
anandtech seems to be the least disputed reviewer, i'll stick to sumerizing thier findings,
except for the Vantage and 3dmark scores which i'm pulling from legitreviews as it's in front of
me as i type this.
$500-$680 $299-$309 $329-$450 $189-$204
1920x1200 4xAA GTX280 4870 GTX260 4850
Crysis(1680x1050)DX10 40.7 35.6 33.6 29.6
call of duty 4 90.9 82.4 74.3 66.4
ET quake wars 99.0 96.8 84.2 75.4
Assasains creed(no AA) 55.5 55.0 50.2 46.6
The witcher (2x AA) 55.1 48.0 46.1 34.5
Bioshock (no AA) 96.7 107.7 69.0 86.8
Oblivion 51.1 41.5 43.0 34.8
---------------------------------------------------------
FPS Total 489.4 467.0 399.6 374.1
Which is overall diff 4.6% 6.4%
$201-$371=$43-$81/% $140-$246=$22-$59/%
Crossfire & SLI $1000-$1360 $598-$618 $398-$690 $390-$400
2560x1600 4xAA GTX280 4870 9800GTX+ 4850
crysis (1920x1200no AA) 51.5 39.3 43.3 36.4
Call of duty 4 109.7 118.4 75 88.2
Quake Wars 124.1 64.1 74.4 53.7
Assasaubs Creed (no AA) 62.5 53.6 59.2 51.5
oblivion 63.4 49.7 48.6 39.5
The Witcher 58.4 59.5 44.5 44.2
Bioshock (no AA) 107.6 119.1 56.2 109.0
-------------------------------------------------------------
FPS Total 577.2 503.7 401.2 422.5
Which is overall diff 12.8% 5.1%
$402-$742=$31-$58/% $8-$290=$1.50-$57/%
1280x1024 3DM vantage overall GPU Score 3DM'06 OA SM3
HIS 4870 CF 13576 13731 17956 9147
Saphire 4850 CF 11625 11194 17708 8826
EVGA GTX 280 11478 11008 16381 7661
PNY GTX 280 10479 9854 15737 6928
HIS 4870 8769 7890 14992 6904
Saphire 4850 7247 6335 13154 5782
Yes i'm crazed, but at least i'm organized.
Now the only reason their is such a performance gap between the GTX 280 SLI and 4870 CF is due to
the 4870's not scaling well in that game where nvidia does exceptionally well. IF i had chosen to
exclude that benchmark, the CF/SLI totals for the 2x2 gpu's would have been
GTX280SLI 453.1 4870 CF 439.6. a performance difference of 3%. or $134 -$247/%
But, that's not really fair for one, the 4800 cards don't have official drivers yet for another,
and honestly, paying $400....at best for just under 13% performance jump isn't worth it, and
anyone who can justify it can't really be stopped...or helped =P.
The 9800gtx+ is really the only nvidia card worth considering to go SLI config, depending on
which card you go with it's the same price as the 4850, and only loses 5% performance compared to
the 4850 CF. Considering the fact that it knocked the gtx260 cards out of the SLI line-up, it
either says how good the 9800+ cards are for the price, or how bad the GTX260's really are. The
other plus with the 9800gtx+ is the physicX or however it's spelled. In vantage it amped the CPU
scores from 13000 up to 33500. For $400, that's something i'm considering toying with, despite
already expecting my 4870's on monday =D.
The GTX280 was out done by Geforce 9800x2, both one on one and while in SLI in a few benchmarks.
While the 9800x2 may be a single card SLI, it's still $100-$250 cheaper then a single GTX280
card.
So, anyone trying to use the exscuse of "i already have a SLI motherboard, it would cost more to
run crossfire since i need a new board...." cue for the charlie brown uber pathetic crying
wail...at which point there is only hope that someone near by you at this juncture has kept their
pimp hand strong to smack the fanboy logic out of you.
There is a 26-27% performance difference between two 4850's CFed and two GTX280's SLIed based on
overall FPS (19% if quake wars scaling bug is remidied) which is a sizeable performance hit, but
You could easily get two 4850's, and a $100-$200 motherboard for the price of a single gtx280.
Hell, for the price of two gtx280's you could two 4870's, a highend motherboard a decent
quadcore, 4 gigs of ram and a beefy PSU to get it pumping along.
Now you have to consider that the 4870x2 will be coming out in a month or two. Two 4870 gpu's
with 2x1gig GDDR5 memory. Single card crossfire, with twice the memor running effectively twice
the speed of any Nvidia card that is or will be out before next spring. with the $400-$500 price
tag that will put it square against the gtx280. The games that the 4870's lag behind in are
those with huge texture maps that the 280's 1gig comes in handy with. Running crysis on Very high
settings with my 2900xt 512mb card in 64bit vista i would see 2.3-2.6 gigs of system memory being
hogged by the game, the amount dropped by about 40% by enabling crossfire.
But, who knows, maybe the 4870x2 will suffer some kind of bug, two gpu's to a single card has
caused problems before. But i really don't think it too likely.
So that should cover pretty conclusively who's where with performance right now....and by nvidia's own admitdance, till next spring most likely.