Banding+Bushido

Phil

Distinguished
Jan 21, 2001
838
0
18,980
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.magic.rules (More info?)

What happen if i use let's say Helm of chatzuk ability to give banding to
any creature, and give banding to a Bushido samurai...and band it with
another bushido samurai....

Now the question....what happen....do they lose bushido....wich bushido take
effect if there is any ?

And what happen if i give banding to a opponent creature that have flying
and the only other creature it can band with is non-flying ? does is attack
become non-flying attack ?
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.magic.rules (More info?)

On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:34:02 -0500, Phil <mjolnir@videotron.ca> wrote:
>What happen if i use let's say Helm of chatzuk ability to give banding to
>any creature, and give banding to a Bushido samurai...and band it with
>another bushido samurai....

Okay. And have them attack after that.

>Now the question....what happen....do they lose bushido....wich bushido take
>effect if there is any ?

Why would gaining Banding cause them to lose Bushido?

If the attacking band (of two creatures) gets blocked, that will trigger the
Bushido of both Samurai. Each Samurai's Bushido will resolve and give the
bonus to that Samurai.

One Samurai's Bushido can't affect the other Samurai; banding them together
to attack in no way "makes them into one creature", "causes them to share
abilities", or anything like that. They are still two separate attacking
creatures; it's just that anything that blocks either one blocks them both
instead.

>And what happen if i give banding to a opponent creature that have flying
>and the only other creature it can band with is non-flying ? does is attack
>become non-flying attack ?

No. The flying banding attacker still has flying and banding. The nonflying
attacker does not gain flying, or banding, or any other quality the other
attacker has. But: any blocker that blocks ONE of them - either one - instead
blocks BOTH of them, regardless of whether it would normally be able to do so.
So in most cases that means the two of them can be blocked by a nonflying
blocker. This does not mean the flying attacker has lost flying - it means
that, even though it has flying, being banded to the nonflying attacker
allowed both of them to be blocked by the creature that normally would only
be able to block the nonflying attacker.

Dave
--
\/David DeLaney posting from dbd@vic.com "It's not the pot that grows the flower
It's not the clock that slows the hour The definition's plain for anyone to see
Love is all it takes to make a family" - R&P. VISUALIZE HAPPYNET VRbeable<BLINK>
http://www.vic.com/~dbd/ - net.legends FAQ & Magic / I WUV you in all CAPS! --K.
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.magic.rules (More info?)

On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:34:02 -0500, "Phil" <mjolnir@videotron.ca>
wrote:

>What happen if i use let's say Helm of chatzuk ability to give banding to
>any creature, and give banding to a Bushido samurai...and band it with
>another bushido samurai....
>
>Now the question....what happen....do they lose bushido....wich bushido take
>effect if there is any ?

No, they don't lose Bushido.

Even if they are banding they are still seperate creatures, and if
they are blocked (or blocks) Bushido triggers seperately for each of
them.

A has Bushido X, B has Bushido Y.
A+B bands, attacks, and is blocked.
A gains +X/+X, B gains +Y/+Y.

>And what happen if i give banding to a opponent creature that have flying
>and the only other creature it can band with is non-flying ? does is attack
>become non-flying attack ?

No, it dosn't become a non-flying attack. However the rules on banding
says this:

502.10e If an attacking creature becomes blocked by a creature, each
other creature in the same band as the attacking creature becomes
blocked by that same blocking creature.

This means that your "flyer + non-flyer" band can be blocked by eg.
Belbe's Percher. And if it does, both your flyer and your non-flyer
are blocked by Belbe's Percher, even if Belbe's Percher normally could
not block one of them.

Belbe's Percher
{2}{B}
Creature -- Bird
2/2
Flying
~this~ may block only creatures with flying.


Ps. Just noticed: There is no point in giving you opponents creatures
banding. It is an option, not a order - you are not forcing his flyer
to band with anything just because you give it banding.

--
Regards
Simon Nejmann
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.magic.rules (More info?)

Oh no! It's Phil!
> What happen if i use let's say Helm of chatzuk ability to give banding to
> any creature, and give banding to a Bushido samurai...and band it with
> another bushido samurai....

I assume you mean attack with the two of them as a band? (There's no
other meaningful definition of "band with" in the way you're using it).

> Now the question....what happen....do they lose bushido....wich bushido take
> effect if there is any ?

No. Why would they lose any abilities? I'm not sure what the question
is.

> And what happen if i give banding to a opponent creature that have flying
> and the only other creature it can band with is non-flying ? does is attack
> become non-flying attack ?

You seem to misunderstand banding rather seriously, sorry.

First of all, I think you probably have the idea that Banding somehow
merges two or more creatures into one. It does no such thing. (The only
thing that does, as far as I know, is a card from the soon-to-be-
released Unhinged set called S.N.O.T.; you'll notice this card is not
from a "normal", tournament-legal set.)

Banding does exactly two things:

1. It allows the player who controls the creatures with Banding to
decide how to assign combat damage dealt to those creatures, in cases
where there's a choice. For example, let's consider your earlier
question about multiple blockers. You have a 3/4 creature attacking an
opponent who controls a number of 1/1 creatures. Several people have
already said what will normally happen, but let's say one of the 1/1
creatures is a Benalish Hero, which has Banding, and the Hero is among
the four blocking creatures. Then your opponent, rather than you, would
get to decide how your 3/4 creature dealt its damage. Your opponent
would almost certainly foist off all the damage on one of the blocking
creatures (probably not the Hero, in case he needs to repeat this
trick); thus your creature would not only die, but would only take one
of the 1/1's with it, rather than three.

Note that this only applies to combat damage. If a creature with
banding, or one attacking in a band, gets hit with a Lightning Bolt,
that works just fine on them.

2. It allows creatures to attack as a band. A band can consist of:
* Any number of creatures with Banding
* Up to one creature without Banding
* Any number of creatures, except one, that don't have Banding but do
have the even more obscure ability Bands with Other <creature type>,
where the creature type listed is the same. (Confused? Don't worry about
it, you'll probably never see it in actual play. The only decent card
that involves Bands with Other is a rare from Legends, called Master of
the Hunt.)

Creatures attacking as a band are still separate creatures for all
purposes. However, if one member of the band is blocked, the blocking
creature also blocks all other members of the band (even those it would
normally be unable to block). For example, if a creature with flying, a
creature with protection from green, and a creature with no abilities
attack as a band, your opponent can block the third creature with
nonflying, green creature, and thus block all three creatures, even
though it would normally be unable to block two of them. This is
informally called "mutual assistance".

The advantage of this is that the blocking creature takes a lot more
damage and thus usually dies, while you (thanks to the other part of
banding) get to spread the damage around in whatever fashion you please,
possibly saving all your creatures. The drawback is that your attacking
band will often be a lot easier to block than some of the individual
creatures in it, as the above example illustrates.

So to revisit your bushido question - the creatures would not lose
bushido, in fact, bushido would be all the more effective in this
situation, as it would trigger for both those creatures if it triggered
for either of them.

And to answer your final set of questions, first of all, even if you
give your opponent's creature banding, you don't get to decide whether
or how your opponent forms attacking creatures into bands. If your
opponent does choose to form such a band, this may as good as negate the
flying creature's flying ability, however, it also means you can't just
block the flier by itself; the drawbacks of this for you don't
necessarily outweigh the advantages. I can't think of a situation where
*successfully* giving an opponent's creature Banding would be to your
advantage (Horobi in play would make using the Helm on an opponent's
creature a good idea, but that doesn't actually end up giving Banding).
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.magic.rules (More info?)

Wow...It seem i had REALLY misunderstood this rule ! ....
I feel dumb ...but ...banding is quite hard to harness....
Thanx for your great help
keep up the good work guys...
"Jeff Heikkinen" <no.way@jose.org> a écrit dans le message de
news:MPG.1c0843eb4dad609e989fcc@news.easynews.com...
> Oh no! It's Phil!
> > What happen if i use let's say Helm of chatzuk ability to give banding
to
> > any creature, and give banding to a Bushido samurai...and band it with
> > another bushido samurai....
>
> I assume you mean attack with the two of them as a band? (There's no
> other meaningful definition of "band with" in the way you're using it).
>
> > Now the question....what happen....do they lose bushido....wich bushido
take
> > effect if there is any ?
>
> No. Why would they lose any abilities? I'm not sure what the question
> is.
>
> > And what happen if i give banding to a opponent creature that have
flying
> > and the only other creature it can band with is non-flying ? does is
attack
> > become non-flying attack ?
>
> You seem to misunderstand banding rather seriously, sorry.
>
> First of all, I think you probably have the idea that Banding somehow
> merges two or more creatures into one. It does no such thing. (The only
> thing that does, as far as I know, is a card from the soon-to-be-
> released Unhinged set called S.N.O.T.; you'll notice this card is not
> from a "normal", tournament-legal set.)
>
> Banding does exactly two things:
>
> 1. It allows the player who controls the creatures with Banding to
> decide how to assign combat damage dealt to those creatures, in cases
> where there's a choice. For example, let's consider your earlier
> question about multiple blockers. You have a 3/4 creature attacking an
> opponent who controls a number of 1/1 creatures. Several people have
> already said what will normally happen, but let's say one of the 1/1
> creatures is a Benalish Hero, which has Banding, and the Hero is among
> the four blocking creatures. Then your opponent, rather than you, would
> get to decide how your 3/4 creature dealt its damage. Your opponent
> would almost certainly foist off all the damage on one of the blocking
> creatures (probably not the Hero, in case he needs to repeat this
> trick); thus your creature would not only die, but would only take one
> of the 1/1's with it, rather than three.
>
> Note that this only applies to combat damage. If a creature with
> banding, or one attacking in a band, gets hit with a Lightning Bolt,
> that works just fine on them.
>
> 2. It allows creatures to attack as a band. A band can consist of:
> * Any number of creatures with Banding
> * Up to one creature without Banding
> * Any number of creatures, except one, that don't have Banding but do
> have the even more obscure ability Bands with Other <creature type>,
> where the creature type listed is the same. (Confused? Don't worry about
> it, you'll probably never see it in actual play. The only decent card
> that involves Bands with Other is a rare from Legends, called Master of
> the Hunt.)
>
> Creatures attacking as a band are still separate creatures for all
> purposes. However, if one member of the band is blocked, the blocking
> creature also blocks all other members of the band (even those it would
> normally be unable to block). For example, if a creature with flying, a
> creature with protection from green, and a creature with no abilities
> attack as a band, your opponent can block the third creature with
> nonflying, green creature, and thus block all three creatures, even
> though it would normally be unable to block two of them. This is
> informally called "mutual assistance".
>
> The advantage of this is that the blocking creature takes a lot more
> damage and thus usually dies, while you (thanks to the other part of
> banding) get to spread the damage around in whatever fashion you please,
> possibly saving all your creatures. The drawback is that your attacking
> band will often be a lot easier to block than some of the individual
> creatures in it, as the above example illustrates.
>
> So to revisit your bushido question - the creatures would not lose
> bushido, in fact, bushido would be all the more effective in this
> situation, as it would trigger for both those creatures if it triggered
> for either of them.
>
> And to answer your final set of questions, first of all, even if you
> give your opponent's creature banding, you don't get to decide whether
> or how your opponent forms attacking creatures into bands. If your
> opponent does choose to form such a band, this may as good as negate the
> flying creature's flying ability, however, it also means you can't just
> block the flier by itself; the drawbacks of this for you don't
> necessarily outweigh the advantages. I can't think of a situation where
> *successfully* giving an opponent's creature Banding would be to your
> advantage (Horobi in play would make using the Helm on an opponent's
> creature a good idea, but that doesn't actually end up giving Banding).
>
>
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.magic.rules (More info?)

Oh no! It's Phil!
> Wow...It seem i had REALLY misunderstood this rule ! ....
> I feel dumb

Don't. You're just learning, and this was a very common mistake even
back when Banding was current. (This question was actually a bit of a
nostalgia trip; it's been a while since I've seen a banding question on
here!)

By the way, I mistakenly attributed one the Dude's questions to you in
my previous reply. Sorry about that.

> ...but ...banding is quite hard to harness....

It's not that complex, but it's more complex than a) it needs to be and
b) than is worthwhile for the amount of impact it actually has. (It
doesn't help that nearly the creatures with Banding were pretty
overpriced - I mean in mana terms, not dollar terms.)

> Thanx for your great help
> keep up the good work guys...
> "Jeff Heikkinen" <no.way@jose.org> a écrit dans le message de
> news:MPG.1c0843eb4dad609e989fcc@news.easynews.com...
> > Oh no! It's Phil!
> > > What happen if i use let's say Helm of chatzuk ability to give banding
> to
> > > any creature, and give banding to a Bushido samurai...and band it with
> > > another bushido samurai....
> >
> > I assume you mean attack with the two of them as a band? (There's no
> > other meaningful definition of "band with" in the way you're using it).
> >
> > > Now the question....what happen....do they lose bushido....wich bushido
> take
> > > effect if there is any ?
> >
> > No. Why would they lose any abilities? I'm not sure what the question
> > is.
> >
> > > And what happen if i give banding to a opponent creature that have
> flying
> > > and the only other creature it can band with is non-flying ? does is
> attack
> > > become non-flying attack ?
> >
> > You seem to misunderstand banding rather seriously, sorry.
> >
> > First of all, I think you probably have the idea that Banding somehow
> > merges two or more creatures into one. It does no such thing. (The only
> > thing that does, as far as I know, is a card from the soon-to-be-
> > released Unhinged set called S.N.O.T.; you'll notice this card is not
> > from a "normal", tournament-legal set.)
> >
> > Banding does exactly two things:
> >
> > 1. It allows the player who controls the creatures with Banding to
> > decide how to assign combat damage dealt to those creatures, in cases
> > where there's a choice. For example, let's consider your earlier
> > question about multiple blockers. You have a 3/4 creature attacking an
> > opponent who controls a number of 1/1 creatures. Several people have
> > already said what will normally happen, but let's say one of the 1/1
> > creatures is a Benalish Hero, which has Banding, and the Hero is among
> > the four blocking creatures. Then your opponent, rather than you, would
> > get to decide how your 3/4 creature dealt its damage. Your opponent
> > would almost certainly foist off all the damage on one of the blocking
> > creatures (probably not the Hero, in case he needs to repeat this
> > trick); thus your creature would not only die, but would only take one