Battlefield serries singleplayer

Brian Jhonson

Honorable
Feb 6, 2014
57
0
10,630
ok i know battlefield is all about multiplayer but singpleplayer is also important having a good story is good thing it makes game more fun.
battlefield 4 campain is crap i can only tell you that bf3 itd still crap but its better than bf4 campain i would like from battlefield series to stop imitating call of duty arcade style and focus more on opet battles with more soldiers an wehicles all in singleplayer
Just look at bf4 campain 4 people fighting against chinese army i mean thats just bulstih.And i would also like to se longer campain 10 hours or more it makes it better
 
I hadn't played a FPS since Doom 2 when I decided to give BF3 a shot. I saw that you could drive a tank and fly in a F/A-18 and really thought it would be fun. I don't care for "twitch" gaming so I have no interest in multiplayer, so it was all about the campaign for me. All i can say is that for $60, it was woefully short and a waste of money and I will never buy another EA game. The day I bought it, there was already a DLC pack available, which made it obvious that EA made the game, segmented it into several pieces and sold the largest piece first. Basically they took a game worth $60 and found a way to get well over $100 from people for it. I have not and will not ever buy the DLC for BF3 or any other game and avoid games designed that way.