I've used both, if the Cryorig had been around when I built my computer,I would have bought it. Although my Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO is working well.
I've used both, if the Cryorig had been around when I built my computer,I would have bought it. Although my Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO is working well.
This one if you are willing to spend $5 more. I've used both, if the Cryorig had been around when I built my computer,I would have bought it. Although my Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO is working well.
bootcher :
The CM EVO is cheap and is considered one of the best coolers:
http://pcpartpicker.com/part/cooler-master-cpu-cooler-rr212e20pkr2
Do you know how loud those coolers run? The main issue I have with the stock cooler is how loud it is.
This one if you are willing to spend $5 more. I've used both, if the Cryorig had been around when I built my computer,I would have bought it. Although my Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO is working well.
bootcher :
The CM EVO is cheap and is considered one of the best coolers:
http://pcpartpicker.com/part/cooler-master-cpu-cooler-rr212e20pkr2
Do you know how loud those coolers run? The main issue I have with the stock cooler is how loud it is.
I've used both, if the Cryorig had been around when I built my computer,I would have bought it. Although my Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO is working well.
This one if you are willing to spend $5 more. I've used both, if the Cryorig had been around when I built my computer,I would have bought it. Although my Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO is working well.
bootcher :
The CM EVO is cheap and is considered one of the best coolers:
http://pcpartpicker.com/part/cooler-master-cpu-cooler-rr212e20pkr2
Do you know how loud those coolers run? The main issue I have with the stock cooler is how loud it is.