Best graphics card for HD/Blu-ray playback (no gaming)?

bobxone

Distinguished
Jun 21, 2008
9
0
18,510
0
I'm looking to upgrade my X1950 Pro for the best HDMI-capable graphics card for Blu-ray disks and HD file playback.

I'm not a gamer, so I don't need a card that's good for that, unless it's the best card for videos too. I'm a movie buff, I have a 30-inch LCD display with an HDMI input, and I want to power it to the max for movie-watching purposes and video editing. I don't want to spend more than I have to, but I don't mind spending whatever I need to if it will make movies look and play better on my display and give me the editing capabilities I need.

All things being equal (if they actually are), ATI Avivo HD or Nvidia Pure Video HD are both fine -- I don't have a brand preference unless I can derive meaningful playback and/or editing advantages from a Crossfire setup, in which case I'd need two ATI cards for my Intel motherboard.

My current system (in addition to the X1950 Pro): Intel D975XBX2 motherboard, QX6700 CPU, 8 GB Mushkin DDR-2 800 RAM, Corsair 620W (3 12V rails) PSU, HT Omega Striker Sound Card, Vista 64-bit OS.

I'd be very grateful for any help. Thanks!
 

jaguarskx

Titan
Moderator
I actually bought an ECS 9600GT which comes with an Artic Cooling S2 "massive" heatsink for my HTPC. The heatsink makes the card about 2" taller than the typical video card. Reasons why I bought it:

1. Passive cooling = no noise
2. Low power consumption. 60w max when gaming, about 40w - 45w max when doing non-gaming stuff like watching video.
3. About 10% - 15% better performance than my X1900XT 512MB in gaming (in case I wanna play games).


As to which is better at "video quality" it is subjective. I've read a few comparisions a couple of and it was a split decision. Some preferred ATI, other preferred nVidia.

Best advice if you can't decide between ATI or nVidia, by 'em both to test them out, then return the one you don't like. In my opinion, that's a huge waste of time.
 

yonef

Distinguished
Jan 22, 2008
289
0
18,780
0
@ jaguarskx: absolutly ****!
@ bobxone:
You do NOT need to spend that much money for a graphic card that you even can't play games!
You can go for much cheaper one (ATI HD3450 or ATI 3650) that are about $50 and they has got UVD wich means that you can play easy Full HD and blue ray even with cheap CPU!
 

knotknut

Distinguished
Aug 13, 2007
1,218
0
19,310
12
Im not trying to sway from what you want just introducing another option.
Have you looked into the MB with intergrated video? They have come a long way in the last year and more to come with the G45 chips, (not avaiable yet). Right now the 780G ATI chip sets seem to hold the 1st spot.
Here is a couple of examples:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813128090
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813131273
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813128341
 

MrMeth

Distinguished
Sep 11, 2007
160
0
18,710
7
Just to let you know Nvidia doesnt support sound over the HDMI and ATI does i found that out the hard way when i got another 8800GS for my HTCP/game system
 

knotknut

Distinguished
Aug 13, 2007
1,218
0
19,310
12


Nvidia supports sound through DVI>HDMI via supplied jumper. SPDIF>Video card. Plug one end into the MB SPDIF the other end into the Video card.

9xxx series up.
 

bobxone

Distinguished
Jun 21, 2008
9
0
18,510
0


Thanks for your suggestion, but I'm delighted with my Intel D975XBX2 motherboard.
 

jeb1517

Distinguished
Apr 15, 2007
259
0
18,780
0


Horrible idea, IMO. He would have to purchase a new motherboard and processor, not to mention re-install a fresh OS which can be the most annoying thing of all.

I say ATI HD3650 should be more than enough. Some come with HDMI output and are less than $100.
 

jaguarskx

Titan
Moderator


If you bothered to actually read my response, I stated that the 9600GT fit the bill for me because:

1. It is passively cooled
2. 60w max under gaming conditions, otherwise 40w - 45w max
3. More powerful than my X1900XT in case I WANT TO PLAY GAMES WITH IT.
 

dagger

Splendid
Mar 23, 2008
5,624
0
25,780
0


If you really want to play newer games, you'll need more than just a single 9600gt.

If you only want to watch videos, hd or not, you can do with just fine with onboard. Remember, cpu is what does the decoding. Even though the latest gpus can also supplement cpu, it's not necessary since all modern dual/quad cores are powerful enough to decode in real time alone without assisstance. When a video is playing, it doesn't matter if your cpu load is 50% or 5%, as long as it doesn't reach 100%, the video will play perfectly smoothly and you'll see no difference. :p
 

KyleSTL

Distinguished
Aug 17, 2007
1,678
0
19,790
1
Second the 3650 suggestion. I can also agree it's complete overkill (in terms of computing power and energy consumption - where's amdfangirl?)for a BluRay playing HTPC (more or less), but if it's old (read: upgraded) equipment, why not re-assign its usage?
 
IMO for now, HD3650, and then later if GPGPU assisted editing does take off get not another, but get an HD4850 on the cheap at that time.

Until GPU assisted encoding actually matures stick with a nice solid base.

My recco;
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814121243

The only reason to consider the nVidia series IMO would be for the dual stream acceleration which works on the G9x series chips, and the RV770, but it's not available on the HD2K and HD3K series. It's not a major issue, but the PIP feature of BluRay would benefit fom dual-stream decoding.
 


However not all streams can be decoded smoothly just on CPU, high bit-rate H.264 BR titles can make a CPU even with a slightly acclerated GMA series GPU chug. Add audio decoding to that and it will be peg close to 90% all the time and chug alot. Better to have the CPU pegged at 5-20% and the GPU running a low 2D workload with little or no sttutering.
http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=3258&p=6

Remember that's a single stream, not dual stream BD2.0 content.

Did I miss something here? Why does it matter if the cpu itself can decode in real time just fine?
Yes, you missed the course on encrypted H.264 encoding/decoding. :kaola:
 


That's not the same an encrypted BR disc, let alone a BD2.0 disc now is it. :kaola:

Not everyone wants to waste their time ripping and re-encoding just to watch a $3 rental.
 

bobxone

Distinguished
Jun 21, 2008
9
0
18,510
0
Yes, but I haven't gotten that far yet. One component at a time.
 

bobxone

Distinguished
Jun 21, 2008
9
0
18,510
0
I checked out this card at Newegg, and it looks good. I like the passive cooling option given the way I'll be using the card.

My only concern is the height of the heatsink. There aren't any specs on the card's precise dimensions either at Newegg or on the ECS site itself (!!!). I can't find a phone number for ECS tech support, either.

Do you know if the heatsink is actually 2" taller than the card's PCB -- or is it slightly shorter or taller?

I have a mid-tower case, but it's only 7-1/2" wide.
 
Actually the Accelero is quite big. It's very effective, but it is big.

Look at the profile shot at NewEgg;
http://www.newegg.com/Product/ShowImage.aspx?CurImage=14-134-040-S02&ISList=14-134-040-S01%2c14-134-040-S02%2c14-134-040-S03%2c14-134-040-S04%2c14-134-040-S05%2c14-134-040-S06&S7ImageFlag=1&Item=N82E16814134040&Depa=0&WaterMark=1&Description=ECS+GeForce+9600+GT+N9600GT-512MX-P+Video+Card+-+Retail

If you've got a mid tower I'd recommend something like this then if you want a GF9600GT;
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814121244

Although I still think that HD3650 ASUS is all you need at a good price, for any space concerns this Sapphire HD3450 will fit any rig and do most things the HD3650 does, and it comes with a native HDMI port as well as DVI;
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814102753

And a different ASUS if you're put off by the reviews of the other one;
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814121237

The GF9600GT is a solid card, but if you're not gaming, for the money you would save on that GF9600GT you could almost buy a Liteon BR-ROM drive or be half way to an BR-Burner (personally I'd recommend the LG BR/HD-DVD COMBO DRIVE, I had one it was great [sold it to a friend due to price of media and cheapness of externall HDDs]).
 

nottheking

Distinguished
Jan 5, 2006
1,456
0
19,310
16
Out of curiosity for while it's being tossed about, what was it that the Radeon HD 3650 had that the HD 3450 lacks that could be useful here? Does it have a better interface for using HDMI? Or was I mistaken in that the SP array of the 3450 (kicking out what, some 48 gigaflops?) would be sufficient, when coupled with a decent CPU, for handling the decoding of encrypted Blu-Ray movies?

Well, they ARE NOT GAMING, so that means that this point, while all very bully for you, is completely pointless to the OP, and hence not germaine to this thread. So don't be surprised when people attack you over it.


Last I checked, anime didn't actually come in 1080p, and tended to often be in resolutions as low as 320x240 particularly when traded over the Internet... That's over 2 megapixels compared to 76.8 kilopixels, a ratio of 27:1, and decoding strain is directly proportionate to the resolution involved. So if you hit, say, 10% utilization (you say, "not even 20%") with those fansubs, then you're talking getting getting about 22/60 fps at 1920x1080... Not ideal. If you're running at DVD-quality 720x480, (345.6 kilopixels) then the ratio goes down to 6:1, which could still be problematic.

And that's just from resolution alone; not to count the other anti-piracy security measures built into the codec when used on commercial BD-ROM movie discs, that wouldn't be bothered with on a fansub...
 

jaguarskx

Titan
Moderator



Here's a better deal. It's a 9600GT made by Asus that is also passively cooled, but it is the height of a standard card. It will take up two slots, just like the ECS I mentioned. Price... $110 after a $20 mail-in rebate,, much less than the ECS 9600GT which is probably selling for around $175.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814121244

Again, max power consumption should be about 40w - 45w under 2D applications, idle is about 20w - 25w and under full load (gaming) 60w. Therefore, if you live in a city with high electricity cost (NYC is about $0.19 - $0.21 per KWH), it'll make your electricity easier to swallow especially if you intend on keeping it on 24/7.

If you are in the market for a power supply, then I recommend the Seasonic S12 series which have a minimum efficiency of 80% and a max of around 88% depending on the load. Last time I checked a technical review, they are general at their most efficient with a 80% - 95% load (i.e. percentage of the max power output).

If you really want to know the height of the ECS 9600GT w/ Arctic Cooling S2, then it'll have to wait 'till the weekend.
 

Similar threads


TRENDING THREADS