Best Of The Best: High-End Graphics Card Roundup

Status
Not open for further replies.
G

Guest

Guest
And those HAWX benchmarks look ridiculous. ATi should wipe floor with nvidia with that. Of course you didn't put dx10.1 support on. Bastard...
 

cangelini

Contributing Editor
Editor
Jul 4, 2008
1,878
9
19,795
4
[citation][nom]quarz[/nom]Only one ATi card? What happened to all those OC'd 4890s?[/citation]

These are the same boards that were included in the recent charts update, and are largely contingent on what vendors submit for evaluation. We have a review upcoming comparing Sapphire's new 1 GHz Radeon HD 4890 versus the stock 4890. It'll be up in the next couple of weeks, though.
 

ohim

Distinguished
Feb 10, 2009
1,195
0
19,360
26
Am i the only one that find this article akward since looking at the tests done on Ati cards on The Last Remnant game makes me wonder what went wrong ... i mean it`s UT3 engine ... why so low performance ?
 

curnel_D

Distinguished
Jun 5, 2007
741
0
18,990
1
Ugh, please tell me that The Last Remnant hasnt been added to the benchmark suite.

And I'm not exactly sure why the writer decided to bench on Endwar instead of World In Conflict. Why is that exactly?

And despite Quarz2's apparent fanboism, I think HAWX would have been better benched under 10.1 for the ATI cards, and used the highest stable settings instead of dropping off to DX9.
 

anamaniac

Distinguished
Jan 7, 2009
2,447
0
19,790
1
The EVGA 295 is the stuff gods game with.

I would love that card. I would have to replace my whole system to work it properly however.
I want $1500 now... i7 920 (why get better? They all seem to be godly overclockers) and EVGA 295.

How about a test suit of the EVGA GTX 295 in crossfire for a quad-gpu configuration? I know there's driver issues, but it would be fun to see what it could do regardless. Along with seeing how far Toms can OC the EVGA GTX 295.
Actually... Toms just needs to do a new system building recommendation roundup. I find them useful personally, and would have used it myself had my cash source had not lost his job...
 
G

Guest

Guest
Weird test:
1) Where are the overclocking results?
2) Bad choice for benchmarks: Too many old DX9 based graphic engines (FEAR 2, Fallout 3, Left4Dead with >100FPS) or Endwar which is limited to 30FPS. Where is Crysis?
3) 1900x1200 as highest resolution for high-end cards?
 

EQPlayer

Distinguished
Jan 31, 2002
230
0
18,680
0
Seems that the cumulative benchmark graphs are going to be a bit skewed if The Last Remnant results are included in there... it's fairly obvious something odd is going on looking at the numbers for that game.
 

armistitiu

Distinguished
Sep 1, 2008
42
0
18,530
0
Worst article in a long time. Why compare how old games perform on NVIDIA's high end graphic cards? Don't get me wrong i like them but where's all the Atomic stuff from Saphire, Asus and XFX had some good stuff from ATI too. So what.. you just took the reference cards from ATI and tested them? :| That is just wrong.
 

darkpower45

Distinguished
Mar 16, 2009
35
0
18,530
0
ok i tried playing The Last Remnant on my comp with my 4870x2 and it failed hardcore >.< the game itself is ridiculously boring too. sooo why is it added to the benching list?? *shakes head* makes me sad...
 

guusdekler

Distinguished
Aug 15, 2008
4
0
18,510
0
I find it a lack this tests do not include the 3DMark Vantage suite.
Ok, there aren't many games using DX10, but some very good ones do !.

Thats the reason i've switched to vista.

And with me enough people to justify a proper DX10 benchmark.
 

Luscious

Distinguished
Apr 5, 2006
525
0
18,980
0
No mention of the GTX 285 2GB version? I'm planning on picking up three of these for a tri-SLI Core i7 build, all water-cooled and overclocked.
 

Ellimist

Distinguished
Jan 30, 2005
19
3
18,515
0
well i'm running an factory overclocked gtx285. only because i like solid drivers and DAAMIT doesn't seem to be able to provide these consistently. thats been my biggest problem in picking up an ATI card.

This review however is terrible. the benchmark selection is dated if nothing else. even toms other reviews of recent have used better benchmarks than this.
 

drealar

Distinguished
Sep 12, 2008
38
0
18,530
0
Like car review magazine (like the one my friend is working for), I THINK they only have cards that were submitted to them and (not sure if this is the case with Tom's) they're only lended for a limited amount of days.

Although I'm not very satisfied (coz lack of ATI card in your possession), I thank you for the review with Fallout, Left 4 Dead and Last Remnant with DX9. Yup I'm still using XP coz the bog-down symptom with Vista is too noticeable for my rig.

1920x1200 as minimum threshold? Cool, as my 23" is limted to 1920x1080 anyway :p
 

JeanLuc

Distinguished
Oct 21, 2002
979
0
18,990
2
I think you guys should cut Tino Kreiss some slack this I believe his first publication? Saying things like "this is the worst article I've read in a long time" doesn't actually help. You can blame the choice of benchmarks suites on sites manager/editor not the author as he only does what he is told to write. So with that in mind............Cangelini your fired.

I am curious though, HAWX is a game sponsored by ATI so why is the HD4890 getting it's backside tanned by the GTX275? It's not just a few FPS behind either the difference is quite remarkable and yes I do realise the BFG GTX275 is overclocked but it's not overclocked by a lot.
 

cangelini

Contributing Editor
Editor
Jul 4, 2008
1,878
9
19,795
4
[citation][nom]JeanLuc[/nom]Cangelini your fired.[/citation]

Perhaps you'll hire me as a copy editor for your posts instead? ;-)

In all seriousness, Tino has been with Tom's German office for a long time. I've asked the staff responsible for testing there to drop in and provide some feedback on the products and benchmarks used here.

Best,
Chris
 

linaaslt

Distinguished
Oct 22, 2008
47
0
18,540
1
How lame this article is... i was always wondering why they don't use full potential of gpu, if ATI is capable of using DX10.1 (and game uses that technology), why not use it. it might not be fair for nvidia but ffs, i believe that this kind of review should show all potential of products.
Shame for TH!
 

JeanLuc

Distinguished
Oct 21, 2002
979
0
18,990
2
[citation][nom]cangelini[/nom]Perhaps you'll hire me as a copy editor for your posts instead? ;-)In all seriousness, Tino has been with Tom's German office for a long time. I've asked the staff responsible for testing there to drop in and provide some feedback on the products and benchmarks used here. Best,Chris[/citation]


*Hint* It would help if you could edit your own posts. :; It really would be handy to have an edit button.
 

radiowars

Distinguished
Feb 15, 2009
422
0
18,790
3
[citation][nom]quarz[/nom]Only one ATi card? What happened to all those OC'd 4890s?[/citation]
I counted 5, did you ONLY read one benchamark?
 
G

Guest

Guest
I don't know with what system you're doing your benchmarks but I have a BFG 285 OC and I have waaaaaaaaay more than 100fps in 1920x1200 max settings + 4AA and 8AF.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ASK THE COMMUNITY