Zoron :
What's wrong with it? I've had no issues using it. It's no worse than WM or OE.
Perhaps am missing something with how to set up Windows Live Mail
1. I have with OE only one set of folders, not a set for each email account. I want just the one Inbox and use message rules to place inward mail in folders I create that I want it to be in. I have multiple accounts on my single PC to serve business, person, forums, and a friend who can no longer operate a PC for himself do to illness.
The above is simple, fast, efficient on OE.
2. Windows Live Mail appears not to have message rules and allow multiple additional folders.
3. Messages are displayed in OE as a single line headers with date, subject, time, date, who from. In Windows Live Mail I get a few messages only per screen page with part of the message body displayed as well. This is great for those who get a handfull of messages per day, but I may get from genealogy forums upwards of 150 per day. Many forum message are immediately deleted after I see the subject is of no interest.
4. Windows Live Mail would not import all saved messages from OE. 90% of them were missing.
To me Windows Live Mail is not designed to suit the application OE did (and does) so well since the 1990s.
Having started with DOS and its logical simplicity over designed Windows programs that eat up hard drive space do nothing for me.
I feel that Thunderbird is trying to go down the same track as M$ in giving people what they think they need, rather than what most want. Most want simplicity, do not need synchronization between multiple PCs.
I don't want to see what is sitting in my Gmail accounts, especially junk mail, whilst using Thunderbird but do. I get Gmail to forward my email to my PC directly and then delete the original copy off the Gmail server automatically. Simple, fast, efficient.
Keith Wellington