Hello. Building a budget PC but have little experience with SSDs and do not know what I should get.
I know what parts I want except for the storage... Will either go for the Seagate momentus XT 750GB hybrid HDD. Or a 1 TB Seagate HDD + 64GB SSD combo. The SSD can not be larger then 64GB or I break my budget (can spend up to $80 on the SSD). In that case, is it better for me to buy a CACHE SSD or traditional SSD, and why?
Cache SSDs
http://www.ocztechnology.com/ocz-synapse-cache-sata-iii-2-5-ssd.html
http://www.corsair.com/en/ssd/accelerator-series-ssd-cache-drives.html
Traditional SSDs
http://www.ssdreview.com/ssd-solid-state-recommendation-25-inch.html#performance
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Considering a OCZ Vertex 4. But it is a marvell controller and MLC. I read on a tweaktown review that SandForce firmware is universal, same for all SSDs. But marvell is up or the individual company to update it, so I assume you might end up with a fast drive in 6months or a slow one, depeding on if the company lays down effort to update.
This is from tweaktown if you care to read...
"It's been said that performance comes from an SSDs firmware and after testing new, higher speed flash on current generation SandForce controllers, we'd say that's pretty accurate. Just slapping higher speed flash on a drive doesn't mean you're going to see any gains in performance at all. With SandForce based drives like the Vertex 3 all of the firmware comes from SandForce. Companies pick and choose features and the package. We suspect each of these features has a dollar value assigned to each one, but very few are willing to talk about the ordering processes.
Marvell controllers on the other hand appear to be 180 degrees in the other direction. Manufacturers seem to have a lot more wiggle room when building firmware and the underlying programming. We can take ten different drives based on Marvell silicon and get ten different benchmark results in each test conducted. Firmware actually matters and the company with the ability to best extract performance from the dual-core ARM SOC architecture will be the one in the best position to take on the Team SandForce mob producing very fast SSDs."
http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/4811/ocz_vertex_4_256gb_solid_state_drive_firmware_1_4_1_5_testing/index1.html
Here I read that SLC > MLC, is that true?
http://enterprisefeatures.com/2011/06/the-difference-between-mlc-multi-level-cell-and-slc-single-level-cell-ssds-solid-state-drives/
I know what parts I want except for the storage... Will either go for the Seagate momentus XT 750GB hybrid HDD. Or a 1 TB Seagate HDD + 64GB SSD combo. The SSD can not be larger then 64GB or I break my budget (can spend up to $80 on the SSD). In that case, is it better for me to buy a CACHE SSD or traditional SSD, and why?
Cache SSDs
http://www.ocztechnology.com/ocz-synapse-cache-sata-iii-2-5-ssd.html
http://www.corsair.com/en/ssd/accelerator-series-ssd-cache-drives.html
Traditional SSDs
http://www.ssdreview.com/ssd-solid-state-recommendation-25-inch.html#performance
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Considering a OCZ Vertex 4. But it is a marvell controller and MLC. I read on a tweaktown review that SandForce firmware is universal, same for all SSDs. But marvell is up or the individual company to update it, so I assume you might end up with a fast drive in 6months or a slow one, depeding on if the company lays down effort to update.
This is from tweaktown if you care to read...
"It's been said that performance comes from an SSDs firmware and after testing new, higher speed flash on current generation SandForce controllers, we'd say that's pretty accurate. Just slapping higher speed flash on a drive doesn't mean you're going to see any gains in performance at all. With SandForce based drives like the Vertex 3 all of the firmware comes from SandForce. Companies pick and choose features and the package. We suspect each of these features has a dollar value assigned to each one, but very few are willing to talk about the ordering processes.
Marvell controllers on the other hand appear to be 180 degrees in the other direction. Manufacturers seem to have a lot more wiggle room when building firmware and the underlying programming. We can take ten different drives based on Marvell silicon and get ten different benchmark results in each test conducted. Firmware actually matters and the company with the ability to best extract performance from the dual-core ARM SOC architecture will be the one in the best position to take on the Team SandForce mob producing very fast SSDs."
http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/4811/ocz_vertex_4_256gb_solid_state_drive_firmware_1_4_1_5_testing/index1.html
Here I read that SLC > MLC, is that true?
http://enterprisefeatures.com/2011/06/the-difference-between-mlc-multi-level-cell-and-slc-single-level-cell-ssds-solid-state-drives/