Bethesda Releases QuakeCon 2012 Tournament Lineup

Status
Not open for further replies.

rantoc

Distinguished
Dec 17, 2009
1,859
1
19,780
Ahh good old quake, gives me memories! Shame ID have fallen from being a company that were pushing the boundaries to making mainstream crap for low-mid hardware.
 

v1ze

Distinguished
Apr 16, 2009
147
0
18,680
[citation][nom]rantoc[/nom]Ahh good old quake, gives me memories! Shame ID have fallen from being a company that were pushing the boundaries to making mainstream crap for low-mid hardware.[/citation]
Rage has an awesome engine that pushed many boundaries for texture utilization. Well that is now that the kinks are worked out. (=
 

bison88

Distinguished
May 24, 2009
618
0
18,980
[citation][nom]aoneone[/nom]Quakeworld v2.30 ^_^ 1997 with Windows 65 and a 486dx2 66 mhz with a 28.8k Baud modem LOL[/citation]


I don't think Quake is compatible with Windows 65 :)
 

rantoc

Distinguished
Dec 17, 2009
1,859
1
19,780
[citation][nom]v1ze[/nom]Rage has an awesome engine that pushed many boundaries for texture utilization. Well that is now that the kinks are worked out. (=[/citation]

It pushes one boundary and its more of a storage-gpu latency boundary push than anything else. A modern computer hardly struggles with the title, just that latency that causes most issues with it.

Sparse Voxel Octree that is stream read and id is currently working on it could be a major step however but its far off. Should be interesting to see what they can get out of that tech.
 

dameon51

Distinguished
Jul 7, 2006
204
0
18,680
[citation][nom]aoneone[/nom]Quakeworld v2.30 ^_^ 1997 with Windows 65 and a 486dx2 66 mhz with a 28.8k Baud modem LOL[/citation] Ugggghhh, I had the 486 dx2 66mhz too, and I have to admit, quake was hurting on it. It was like 5 fps... but.... I still beat it on that rig.
 

doorspawn

Distinguished
Feb 10, 2010
173
0
18,680
[citation][nom]rantoc[/nom]Sparse Voxel Octree that is stream read and id is currently working on it could be a major step however but its far off. Should be interesting to see what they can get out of that tech.[/citation]

Voxels suck at non-orthogonal walls. If you want angles, you're gonna need polygons or similar.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.