Book Printing Kiosk Adds Google Books Titles

Status
Not open for further replies.

hellwig

Distinguished
May 29, 2008
1,743
0
19,860
Never heard of such a thing. I'd be surprised if they can actually make any money.

That said, if I print out a book from this kiosk, will the government come hunting me down after they outlaw the Google and Authors Guild book deal?
 

endif

Distinguished
May 19, 2009
62
0
18,630
This sounds like a great idea, I will agree with that. My only concerns are that this will start to decrease the amount of money authors are getting for their books. Also it sounds like a HUGE waste of paper. Make the kiosk support devices like the kindle.
 

nottheking

Distinguished
Jan 5, 2006
1,456
0
19,310
Well, according to the article's "rumors," it'd take a machine being used 25,000-32,000 or so times before it manages to pay for itself, at $3 per book. And at an estimated 5 minutes per book, that means that the machine would have to be constantly printing for around a quarter-year non-stop, without any delays, break-downs, or merely people not using it (such as the building being closed) in order to make that.

As a result, I have my doubts if it'd actually turn a profit; it's a very nice idea to think of, though; many of us simply don't like reading off of a screen, or reading off of e-paper; physical books are more comfortable and easier to read.

Of course, I'd also question their definition of "library quality;" given the brief time to print it all, I wonder what form of inks are being used, as well as the quality of the paper involved. Perhaps mostly, I question what durability the binding will be; since all the books are "printed on-demand," that means the machine is going to have to automate and adjust to binding a different number of pages each time, which could yield problems. (normal book printing involves precise, human-adjusted setting of the binding machines, that won't vary since it'll print a LOT of just one book)
 

domenic

Distinguished
Apr 23, 2009
69
0
18,630
I think it would save paper (and trees) if it would replace hard cover books, non-recycled paper, and coated paper we see in bookstores everywhere.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Um... if anything, the machine would SAVE paper, when compared to current methods. You'd only have those books printed that you end up reading, instead of printing an issue thousands of times as is done right now. Seems like a step forwards to me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.