Afraid that the notion of "slow" is going to be a bit abstract and subjective (not surprisingly), since I've not run any benchmarks and not aware of many benchmarks that are easy-to-setup and run on Linux.
Yes, the new build is running a flavour of Ubuntu Linux (LXDE based one, called Lubuntu). It has been a distribution of my choice for several years. This flavour of Linux is super lean-n-mean. It is lacking all modern bells-n-whistles, but on old, low-spec'd systems gets the job done amazingly fast. I have a Intel Pentium Dual-core (yes, some 8yrs old, with 2GB ram) laptop, on which Lubuntu loads applications like word-processor (LibreOffice), video-editing software (Kdenlive), loops-centric DAW (LMMS) reasonably fast, and they are usable (although the video rendering is expectedly super-super-super slow, and audio-recordings via external USB interface, drop samples).
Compare that with my brand new i5-8400 build, which is still an entry-level i5 build but is expected to be exponentially faster than that old Pentium Dual-core laptop, doesn't feel much faster, and in fact a bit of a disappointment. First, the configuration:
CPU: i5-8400, with stock cooler
Mobo: MSI H310M-VH (pretty entry level, with entry-level i5-8th gen ready chipset H310)
Ram: Crucial DDR-2400 8GB single-stick (and single channel, dual-rank UDIMM, 1.2V, CL17) -- installed in slot#2 of mobo as slot#1 is faulty.
HDD: 1TB Seagate Barracude 7200rpm SATA (yes, in the age of m.2 SSD, I know...)
PSU: Crucial VS450 (450W, Bronze cat)
Discrete GPU: None
This new build is also running Lubuntu 18.04 and while kernel compilation is blazing fast, and video rendering is much-much faster than on my laptop (indeed exponentially faster), and audio-interface is not dropping samples... it is the application launch, and general "responsiveness" of all graphical applications, that has left me disappointed. I am wondering if I really made a big mistake by not going for a B360 based mobo (with option to add intel Optane stick -- since it's USP seems to be significant speed-up application loading) ? But, the laptop with a 8yr old processor, and 5200rpm drive, with tiny caches... doesn't feel that much slower in terms of application startup speed and general responsiveness, than an i5. Why ? Is it that I had to tweak certain BIOS settings ? Or is it that I had misplaced (too high) expectations ?
TIA
Yes, the new build is running a flavour of Ubuntu Linux (LXDE based one, called Lubuntu). It has been a distribution of my choice for several years. This flavour of Linux is super lean-n-mean. It is lacking all modern bells-n-whistles, but on old, low-spec'd systems gets the job done amazingly fast. I have a Intel Pentium Dual-core (yes, some 8yrs old, with 2GB ram) laptop, on which Lubuntu loads applications like word-processor (LibreOffice), video-editing software (Kdenlive), loops-centric DAW (LMMS) reasonably fast, and they are usable (although the video rendering is expectedly super-super-super slow, and audio-recordings via external USB interface, drop samples).
Compare that with my brand new i5-8400 build, which is still an entry-level i5 build but is expected to be exponentially faster than that old Pentium Dual-core laptop, doesn't feel much faster, and in fact a bit of a disappointment. First, the configuration:
CPU: i5-8400, with stock cooler
Mobo: MSI H310M-VH (pretty entry level, with entry-level i5-8th gen ready chipset H310)
Ram: Crucial DDR-2400 8GB single-stick (and single channel, dual-rank UDIMM, 1.2V, CL17) -- installed in slot#2 of mobo as slot#1 is faulty.
HDD: 1TB Seagate Barracude 7200rpm SATA (yes, in the age of m.2 SSD, I know...)
PSU: Crucial VS450 (450W, Bronze cat)
Discrete GPU: None
This new build is also running Lubuntu 18.04 and while kernel compilation is blazing fast, and video rendering is much-much faster than on my laptop (indeed exponentially faster), and audio-interface is not dropping samples... it is the application launch, and general "responsiveness" of all graphical applications, that has left me disappointed. I am wondering if I really made a big mistake by not going for a B360 based mobo (with option to add intel Optane stick -- since it's USP seems to be significant speed-up application loading) ? But, the laptop with a 8yr old processor, and 5200rpm drive, with tiny caches... doesn't feel that much slower in terms of application startup speed and general responsiveness, than an i5. Why ? Is it that I had to tweak certain BIOS settings ? Or is it that I had misplaced (too high) expectations ?
TIA