B Burnoutt Honorable Jul 11, 2013 16 0 10,510 Jul 15, 2013 #1 Building a budget gaming computer, and I'm currently trying to decide between the Phenom 965 ($89), or the FX-6300 ($119) In your opinion, is the 6300 worth the extra $30? Or would I be best to stick with the 965? I will NOT be over-clocking.
Building a budget gaming computer, and I'm currently trying to decide between the Phenom 965 ($89), or the FX-6300 ($119) In your opinion, is the 6300 worth the extra $30? Or would I be best to stick with the 965? I will NOT be over-clocking.
Solution 06yfz450ridr Jul 15, 2013 http://cpuboss.com/cpus/AMD-Phenom-II-X4-965-vs-AMD-FX-6300 its a little bit faster, 95w tdp so it will run cooler as well. i would just spend the extra 30 bucks
http://cpuboss.com/cpus/AMD-Phenom-II-X4-965-vs-AMD-FX-6300 its a little bit faster, 95w tdp so it will run cooler as well. i would just spend the extra 30 bucks
06yfz450ridr Honorable Nov 28, 2012 2,610 5 13,460 Jul 15, 2013 Solution #2 http://cpuboss.com/cpus/AMD-Phenom-II-X4-965-vs-AMD-FX-6300 its a little bit faster, 95w tdp so it will run cooler as well. i would just spend the extra 30 bucks Upvote 0 Downvote Solution
http://cpuboss.com/cpus/AMD-Phenom-II-X4-965-vs-AMD-FX-6300 its a little bit faster, 95w tdp so it will run cooler as well. i would just spend the extra 30 bucks
swilczak Distinguished Apr 12, 2012 1,032 0 19,860 Jul 15, 2013 #3 I think it's worth the extra $30. The 6300 is 32nm and 965 is 45nm, which makes a big difference in efficiency plus the 6300 has 2 extra threads that may be useful in the future when games are optimized to use more threads. Upvote 0 Downvote
I think it's worth the extra $30. The 6300 is 32nm and 965 is 45nm, which makes a big difference in efficiency plus the 6300 has 2 extra threads that may be useful in the future when games are optimized to use more threads.
E Eamon Burns 99 Distinguished Mar 27, 2013 65 0 18,630 Jul 15, 2013 #4 I have a 6300 and I can tell you theyre great and it stays pretty cool even when gaming Upvote 0 Downvote