Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (
More info?)
"WiMax0007" <wimax0007@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040607130451.09269.00000597@mb-m03.aol.com...
> > 24 hour support is now History. Sounds like grounds for anyone to get
> > out of their contract.
>
> Which part of the Service Agreement has been breached? Hint- there is
> nothing about 24 hour support in any version of it. No grounds for
voiding
> the agreement.
> ==================================
>
> Where in the agreement does it say they may change it?
>
> ALL CONTRACTS ARE NOW NULL AND VOID UPON REQUEST.
Thanks for proving the point. I would love to be present in court when you
explain to the judge why the contract should be voided for a condition not
specified in the agreement. And when Sprint gets the chance to ask just
how the lack of a person to talk to affects the quality of network service
(which is mentioned in the contract), I want to be there to watch you get
thrown out quicker than the eye can see. And when it is proven to not even
be an industry standard, the game is finally over.
You see, Phil- Sprint would have to actually violate the terms of the
agreement in order to be in violation of it. See how that works? And
because there has never been a guarantee of 24/7 customer support, ALL
CONTRACTS REMAIN IN EFFECT.
And as you are finding out, the hours of operation have not changed in
months, and there is no documentation that 24/7 care was ever advertised.
Please do a little research before giving advice.