LOL, well like you said, to each their own. But I'm sorry, but until someone tells me those screeshots are photoshopped or otherwise falsified, I'm more inclined to blame a company who has an established history of abusing capitalism's inherent weaknesses to gain an leg up on its competition than an individual who invests their own money into components to test them.
As far as getting a 2500K past 4.4GHZ, ever CPU overclocks differently. This is true for both AMD and Intel, I don't know the issue he was having, but there is no evidence to suggest hes lying. Yes, I know some people can go to great lengths to prove a point, but come on now, thats silly.
Yes the Bulldozers suck at stock speeds, yes their single core performance is dismal, these are things I won't dispute. But I have yet to see a review site that has actually really done in depth overclocking tests such as the ones this guy performed.