News California man sues Microsoft for discontinuing Windows 10 — says company is doing this to “monopolize the generative AI market”

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
I have no issue with Microsoft EOL as each OS hit there life span. Where I feel the injustice comes from is not in the future support and future updates but the removal of all up dates that have secured windows 10 all the way up to there coming up October deadline.

When EOL comes in October every security release ever put out there will be hosted on a dead Microsoft page. Meaning it will be a page that says "Oops something went wrong"

Removing all the past years of updates " If one needed to keep Windows 10 and later needed to reinstall" and not a chance in heck being able to get anything that was already there from Microsoft after EOL.

That's the grey area that bites you in the rear.

Just be fully updated before EOL and have a clone or a disc image as a backup because moving forward is doable keeping Windows 10 on life support for a while but it really is all on you.

And for the record most of the regulars know I run Windows 11 but I run 11 on non supported CPU's.

I have no more love for 10 than Windows 11 but I do have a passions for keeping things running.
 
Last edited:
I have no issue with Microsoft EOL as each OS hit there life span. Where I feel the injustice comes from is not in the future support and future updates but the removal of all up dates that have secured windows 10 all the way up to there coming up October deadline.

When EOL comes in October every security release ever put out there will be hosted on a dead Microsoft page. Meaning it will be a page that says "Oops something went wrong"

Removing all the past years of updates " If one needed to keep Windows 10 and later needed to reinstall" and not a chance in heck being able to get anything that was already there from Microsoft after EOL.

That's the grey area that bites you in the rear.

Just be fully updated before EOL and have a clone or a disc image as a backup because moving forward is doable keeping Windows 10 on life support for a while but it really is all on you.

And for the record most of the regulars know I run Windows 11 but I run 11 on non supported CPU's.

I have no more love for 10 than Windows 11 but I do have a passions for keeping things running.

The Microsoft Update Catalog will continue to house those updates for download.
 
Every other OS version, no matter if Windows, Linux, Apple....expires and falls off support after some time.
yes, but this inability to go to 11 is a 100% MS choice.
There is no harm in allowing them to use the OS becasue of lack of TPM2.0They could easily allow peopel to use it and just have a popup saying "we aint responsible if crap happens"

They are purposefully obsoleting thousands to millions of devices for an arbitrary thing.

this isnt like win7 which was too advanced that msot machiens made it awful to run it on...win11 is no worse than 11 performance wise
 
  • Like
Reactions: voyteck
This is a frivolous lawsuit, at best.

No one is forcing anyone to upgrade to Win 11. As others have mentioned, you have choices/options.

Whether users like those options, or those options are in their best interest, is really not a MS problem. Now is it?

If this really bothers you as a consumer for whatever the reason, make a different choice. There. Easy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Amdlova
A valid Win 10 retail license upgrades to Win 11 for free.

In fact....
A valid Win 7 license from 2009 could have upgraded to Win 10, for free.
And then to Win 11, for free.

So 16+ years on the same $100 purchase from 2009....and people have heartburn about that.

My current Windows 11 Pro install started its life as a disc-based Windows 8 Pro I bought circa 2012 when buying a Lenovo laptop. They had this promo where I could get the Pro version for the price of Home version, so I bite.

It already went through like 5 different devices, and several Windows versions (8, 8.1, 10, and now 11), and the fact the license still works... is kind of interesting.

Not siding with MS or anything.
 
The biggest culprit is the TPM requirement.

Usually with major hardware changes, MS will inform all the partners that X is recommended starting next version, and will be required after 3-4 years when another future versions comes. This happened with every major hardware changes like some CPU or GPU feature, it might be 3-4 years and it might be even longer, but there was always a grace period of "recommended, then required" change.

This thing didn't happen with TPM, or it happened but with a very short term that all hardware makers were shocked, they were not prepared. This change basically made modern hardware obsolete because of the software.
 
MS needs to keep up the sharade. Every corpo that creates a product doesn't create it for consumer/end-user a.k.a. a person who in the end pays for the product, but for share/stakeholders. And Markets require true or false improvements and constant innovation, so that annual reports can look good. Without at least seeming progress, the stocks would go down. It's a deathloop of so called Stock Market "development" and constant "improvement." In other words, MS has to push for new even if it completely damages and/or destroys integrity, functionality and legacy of their primary product. That's how Markets work.
 
The lawsuit is an interesting development, although I don't think it will pass muster.

As for MS, they really don't care about retail users since the larger user base for desktop is enterprise. Those who Jump to Linux / Apple / whatever will be in the minority, and they know it. As it has been every time in the past.

For the record, I am going to be one of them who jumps. I have several W10 machines and when that goes away, I am porting to Ubuntu or a similar disto. I will only keep 1 Windows machine for those things that absolutely need it.
I want to know if this lawsuit will be a class action? If so how can I join?
 
We were told when Windows 10 arrived that it would be the last Windows version, and that users would only receive software updates for it.
No we weren't.
That was a throwaway comment, totally misunderstood over the years.
Well, if the only source ever was that "throwaway comment" by Jerry Nixon, it was misunderstood by a lot of people, including a Microsoft CTO over a year later.

Windows Internals Seventh Edition, Part 1 (also PDF):
Windows 10 and future Windows versions

With Windows 10, Microsoft declared it will update Windows at a faster cadence than before. There will not be an official “Windows 11”; instead, Windows Update (or another enterprise servicing model) will update the existing Windows 10 to a new version. At the time of writing, two such updates have occurred, in November 2015 (also known as version 1511, referring to the year and month of servicing) and July 2016 (version 1607, also known by the marketing name of Anniversary Update).

I agree the lawsuit is stupid. I agree that Microsoft is always an easy target and don't quite deserve all the hate that comes their way, often from those who will never upgrade to 11 from 10 (the 10 that they were never going to upgrade to from 7, the 7 that they were never going to upgrade to from XP, the XP that they were never going to upgrade to from 98SE*) but I disagree that '10 forever' was some big misunderstanding. I'm sure they did have that intention for some years, and at the time it even made a fair amount of sense.


*I remember one of the most passionate complaints by users against XP was the 'bubbly Fisher-Price/Tellytubbies UI'. When Windows 10 came along, lots of users complained about the 'flat monochromatic UI'...