Archived from groups: alt.sys.pc-clone.dell (
More info?)
wayne wrote:
> I have to agree about ME in that it was a hurried OS that had an incredibly
> short life
> IN 1995 Windows 95 came out in 98 Windows 98 then in 2000 ME comes out.
>
> Less than a year later (8 mos) XP is announced. The incredibly short life
> of ME shows how poorly it did as MS would have sold it for a longer period
> of time if they felt they could. I think part of the reason for ME was
> that they decided not to have a "Home" version of Wink. ME was in many ways
> XP beta that was sold to people. It had plenty of new features like restore
> points but it lacked polish and support from many vendors. You can try
> win2k or 98 drivers and they may work.
>
> I would stick with XP using the classic view and turning off all the cartoon
> features by choosing best performance and classic interface
>
> Wayne
>
Someone in the IBM Thinkpad newsgroup tried to convince me that Windows
ME was only released to force developers to start writing for 2000/XP.
The idea with ME was that any code that wouldn't run on NT based Windows
(2000/XP) will not work on ME. This is why most people had much greater
success with 98SE (nothing was intentionally broken for compatibility
reasons). I don't entirely buy the argument (the poster claimed ME was
released solely for this purpose), I beleive ME was a last greedy stab
at consumers prior to releasing XP (forcing developers was a side
benefit).