[SOLVED] Can i play Battlefield 5 on my pc or is it too old? ( Multiplayer )

[Pomfrit]

I5 2400
Gtx 1050 ti 4gb
8gb ram... will probably upgrade to 12gb.

how much fps will i get ? I care only about gameplay not graphics... also ill get the game for 15$

this picture legit?

 

[sizzling]

It might run but an old quad core is going to struggle in such a cpu heavy game. 8gb RAM isn’t helping.

 

[Pomfrit]

It might run but an old quad core is going to struggle in such a cpu heavy game. 8gb RAM isn’t helping.

So i should not buy it ?

 

[Phaaze88]

It might not be that bad: https://www.gpucheck.com/game-gpu/b...gtx-1050-ti/intel-core-i5-2400-3-10ghz/medium
Since it's a benchmark, actual in game performance will likely be lower. Forget about ultra and high settings if you want a steady 60fps.

 

[Pomfrit]

It might not be that bad: https://www.gpucheck.com/game-gpu/b...gtx-1050-ti/intel-core-i5-2400-3-10ghz/medium
Since it's a benchmark, actual in game performance will likely be lower. Forget about ultra and high settings if you want a steady 60fps.

Im happy with a mix of low/medium settings

 

[sizzling]

Im happy with a mix of low/medium settings

Game settings have minimal impact on cpu requirements. A cpu that can only deliver 30 FPS at high settings will likely only deliver 30 FPS at lowest settings. The cpu determines the best FPS you can achieve, the gpu determines at what resolution and game settings you can achieve that FPS at.

I tried BF1 which is equally cpu heavy to BF5 on a system with a stronger i5 4670k @ 4.3GHz and 16GB RAM. Multiplayer was not an enjoyable experience with horrible FPS drops and a cpu constantly at 100%.

 

[mdd1963]

Do you mean not buy the game, or, not buy the rig?

I think you'd find BF5 performance a tad lacking, but,...I thought the game decent enough even on a 7700K's integrated graphics at 768P, so, you might be ok for a bit, gaming performance can be subjective.....

 

[Pomfrit]

Do you mean not buy the game, or, not buy the rig?

I think you'd find BF5 performance a tad lacking, but,...I thought the game decent enough even on a 7700K's integrated graphics at 768P, so, you might be ok for a bit, gaming performance can be subjective.....

In planning to buy the game but im not sure my pc can handle it

 

[drivinfast247]

Get the game and find out. I don't think it'll be enjoyable/playable on your PC, though.

 

[Pomfrit]

Get the game and find out. I don't think it'll be enjoyable/playable on your PC, though.

I dont feel like spending 15$ if it wont be playable not even on low :/ that sux thanks for help

 

[drivinfast247]

I dont feel like spending 15$ if it wont be playable not even on low :/ that sux thanks for help

That chart shows very high framerates. But I don't think that was in multiplayer. A full conquest map puts a decent load on a 8 core 16 thread CPU.

 

[Pomfrit]

That chart shows very high framerates. But I don't think that was in multiplayer. A full conquest map puts a decent load on a 8 core 16 thread CPU.

My gf has a i5 4570 rx 570 and she dont have that high fps as the chart shows ><

 

[Pomfrit]

That chart shows very high framerates. But I don't think that was in multiplayer. A full conquest map puts a decent load on a 8 core 16 thread CPU.

Lets say i get 40fps.. would that be playable mp?

 

[EndEffeKt_24]

Lets say i get 40fps.. would that be playable mp?

You will not have an enjoyable experience.

 

[Pomfrit]

You will not have an enjoyable experience.

Isnt it on consoles 30fps ?

 

[drivinfast247]

Isnt it on consoles 30fps ?

For some games. Most/all FPS are 60fps.