Can i run Battlefield 1 at minimum settings with 30fps?

[BobbyPick]

Hi, would I be able to run battlefield 1 at 1080p on these specs? my PC specs are:

• 
  CPU: A10 6700 3.7Ghz
  GPU: ASUS Strix 960 2GB
  RAM: 8GB
  PSU: EVGA 600 watt

 

[grana92]

Yes, I believe even medium will give you good frame rates.

 

[Rusty1983]

I can run it on minimum with my system with decent FPS.. so you should at least manage medium.

 

[burgessanthony]

Big issue could be drops below 60fps with that CPU. Even moderately clocked i5s will drop below 60fps on MP and its kinda irrelevant to graphics settings to a point. I'd be wary.

'decent fps' means lots to different people. For this game IMO, 60 is min enjoyable for MP

 

[Rusty1983]

I get around 56, and it's playable

 

[BobbyPick]

Big issue could be drops below 60fps with that CPU. Even moderately clocked i5s will drop below 60fps on MP and its kinda irrelevant to graphics settings to a point. I'd be wary.

'decent fps' means lots to different people. For this game IMO, 60 is min enjoyable for MP

Thanks for replies. To be honest i'm not really bothered what the settings are on as long as it is above playable fps then i'm good.

 

[burgessanthony]

No worries! it can be very subjective. I lock at 70 fps (monitor refresh) and ANY deviation is noticeable. <60 feels poor for me but it really is each to their own.

If you are happy, then great

 

[Bluescreendeath]

Big issue could be drops below 60fps with that CPU. Even moderately clocked i5s will drop below 60fps on MP and its kinda irrelevant to graphics settings to a point. I'd be wary.

'decent fps' means lots to different people. For this game IMO, 60 is min enjoyable for MP

You are greatly exaggerating the required fps. You forget that most monitors out there have a maximum refresh rate of 60 frames per second. And many console games (even shooters) lock their fps at 30, with very few graphically intensive console games reaching 60 and over. If people needed a minimum of 60 fps, then the majority of good looking console games would not be playable.
Playable means different things for different people, but playable is not the same as "butter smooth/unnoticeable frame drops." The general rule of thumb for games has been around 30-40 fps for playability, and higher for better quality of gameplay.

 

[burgessanthony]

Largely disagree. For me, it is very noticeable when fps drops. No, I don't need 120fps. 60 is absolutely fine, and for games like Witcher, 40 is playable due to the nature of the game.

BUT, for fast FPS games, sorry, but locked 60 is a must for me to call it playable. Yes, you can 'play' it with drops, but I find it very distracting, particularly in games like BF. It is most important when you have a lot on screen, then a grenade explodes, causing extra work for GPU/CPU and you drop to say 45fps, and the resultant stutter causes you to miss a shot. THEN its a problem, and given most BF is played online, it does matter.

No where did I say anything about more than 60 fps.