Can my pc run 1440p?

AndrewMayers

Prominent
Mar 10, 2017
6
0
510
Hey everyone,
I'm looking for a new monitor for my setup. I have been looking at an lg 34" ultrawide with 1440x3400 resolution(34uc97-s). I've also been looking at a lg 29" ultrawide with 1080x2500 resolution (29uc97c-b). i should probably add that both monitors are curved. These are my pc specs:
-I5-6400 quad-core with 2.7 ghz I think
-8gb of ram
-Gtx 970 4gb graphics card.
Witch screen would you recommend. And can my pc support the higher 1440p resolution? And do you think the 34" ultrawide is too big? And lastly which ultrawide would you recommend for gaming?
 
Solution


You're welcome!

I got my 29" 1080p ultrawide way back when I had a smaller desk. During that time, it WAS ~20" away from my eyes, using it's own stand. There were definitely NO evidence of pixelation from that vantage point. Add to the fact that it is an IPS panel, it just certainly works for my needs. I got that monitor mainly for multi-tasking work, a bit of...
I own a GTX 970 and a 29" ultrawide (Asus PB298Q) and have also looked into a 34" ultrawide.

As for the 29", it's physical dimension (height) is similar to a regular 16:9 ratio 23" screen but with an added screen real estate at its sides. The 29" looks small when viewed from afar (such as watching movies away from your desk). From my experience, a 29" ultrawide at 1080p resolution is best viewed from a distance of no more than 20". If you move the monitor further back than that, there is a great chance you would have to lean forward a bit to read default-sized texts/icons.

For the 34", it is similar in physical dimension (height) of a regular 27" screen, but, again, with sides extended. The 1440p resolution is a sweet spot for the 27" 16:9 and 34" 21:9 monitors as the ppi (pixels per inch) are packed tightly avoiding any pixelations you would rather see on a 27" 1080p screen, especially when viewed from a close distance. The downside of a 1440p resolution however is the default-size of texts and icons becomes "smaller" compared to 1080p. In effect, both 34" or 27" 1440p monitors would be much better if positioned closer about 16" to 18".

The GTX 970 would surely struggle in the 2560x1440p resolution (i.e., ~3.7M pixels), especially if using ultrawide 3400x1440 (which is equivalent to ~4.9M pixels). I find it difficult to play at ultra settings on selected AAA games (e.g., Witcher 3, ROTR, etc.) with my 29" 2560x1080 (i.e., ~2.7M pixels), without getting acceptable framerates.

A good GPU for 1440p-resolution gaming is the GTX 1070 (before, it was the GTX 980Ti). If you do plan on getting the 34" 1440p, I would suggest to also get a proportional GPU to power your graphics at that number of pixels.
 
Thank a lot for taking the time to give such an in depth answer. As an owner of a 29" ultrawide, would you recommend it, an then play at high settings, or should i stick to a 24" 16:9 monitor? And lastly, do you notice pixels an a ultrawide 1080p 29" (if you sit from about 20" away from the screen? And do you see the pixels when you start to divide the screen?)

Oh, and I saw that in your setup (which is awesome btw) you have 4 monitors. I am only looking to buy one monitor, and have a single monitor setup. Will my GPU be able to run 1440p when its only one screen?

 
The gtx 970 will handle the 29 inch 2560x1080 screen OK when it comes to gaming.

The 34 inch 3400x1440?? Its honestly going to be vastly under powered for that resolution mate for gaming.

See pixels on the 29 inch ??
No , not at all , as stated above the 29 inch 1080p ultrawide is essentially the same size as a 24 inch panel but with extra width on the sides.
 


You're welcome!

I got my 29" 1080p ultrawide way back when I had a smaller desk. During that time, it WAS ~20" away from my eyes, using it's own stand. There were definitely NO evidence of pixelation from that vantage point. Add to the fact that it is an IPS panel, it just certainly works for my needs. I got that monitor mainly for multi-tasking work, a bit of gaming, and a bit of watching movies.

For multi-tasking work, such as Photoshop, AutoCAD, and Excel, it definitely excels! I can fit 2 browsers side-by-side, viewing them simultaneously without having to Alt+Tab my way out as compared to 16:9 screens.

For movies, the ultrawide works best when the content is in a cinematic format. Viewing such movies at an aspect ratio of 21:9 would remove the black bars on the top and bottom (movie becomes full screen without distortions). Howevver, when viewing older movies and tv shows (usual content at 4:3 ratio), there would be black bars at the left and right of the screen -- which I initially found a bit distracting, but, in time, have gotten used to.

For gaming, NOT all games support ultrawide aspect ratios but most do. For such games that doesn't (older games especially), I am forced to stretch either live with the black side bars *or* force the 2560 x 1080 resolution in in-game settings (a bit of image stretching is noticeable). But most games I play support the ultrawide resolution and is very astounding. The extra screen real estate definitely helps in viewing the periphery otherwise not seen in traditional widescreen monitors. Racing games and maps in strategy games become wider in view. I loved the atmosphere of playing FPS as if you are gaming movie/cinematic-style with the ultrawide. What I only find distracting is when playing games that involve cut-scenes -- where the scenes play in traditional 16:9 format with black side bars before returning back to 21:9 when the scene ends and you start to game again.

Now, I have a multi-monitor setup (see link in my signature), where I got a new and larger desk (48" depth). The 29" ultrawide is now mounted on a vertical desk clamp-style mount and the screen is now positioned almost 36" away from my view. With this distance, the 29" ultrawide suddenly became "smaller" than usual -- including the default icons and text sizes. I can barely read texts in Excel of Calibri 8pt size in 100% view compared to before. But for gaming and movies, the new monitor distance was just slightly noticeable.

Depending on the games you play with a GTX 970, you can get by on ultra settings with 50+ fps (such as Project Cars, Civilization and other strategy games, NBA2K games, and the like) but for some GPU-hungry games, I would have to tweak the graphics settings and the eye-candy a bit lower to get acceptable framerates (such as Witcher 3, Shadow of Mordor, Rise of the Tomb Raider, etc.).

I would highly recommend the 29" ultrawide if the pros outweigh the cons based on your specific usage/settings in games you play on the monitor. As for my situation, I am now in the process of getting a larger monitor and GPU (possibly, a 34" 1440p ultrawide + GTX 1080).
 
Solution