Question Can some one help me check the information, is my hard drive safe?

pikapika1998

Reputable
Dec 27, 2020
49
0
4,530
Untdfdfitled.png


thanks for you read this post , i'm not good at computer, i just bought a hard drive and it seems new, but i don't know the numbers below, can someone help me check if the drive is safe? thanks
 
I see zero wrong with that.
Presumably a brand new drive?

Are you keeping a known good backup of the data on this drive?

I've personally had a drive go from fine to dead dead dead in about 2 days.
i have a 2.5 2t drive from my laptop for backup

sir, i beg to ask you one more question

I see the system says this hard drive is 5700 rpm, while on the website it says 5400 rpm, so is this fine ?

Untdfdfitled.png





Untitledvdvd.png
 
The RPM rating in DiskInfo is reported by the firmware, not something that is "detected" by the software directly. WD's "IntelliPower" was claimed to be variable speed drives so they could slow down when high speed wouldn't help performance, thus saving power and reducing noise, but it turned out they weren't doing that and were just slower drives.

Not directly related to OP's question, but, WD has a history of reporting RPMs which are demonstrably not what the drive is actually spinning at, including with the Red drives. The result is drives that use WAY more power and produce more noise than one would expect for the RPM rating. They seem to have simply artificially limited the performance (throughput/access time) via firmware in order to use the same hardware in different "classes" so they didn't need multiple factory lines, just making the controller not transfer data as quickly as the platters and heads could actually handle it.


The specs for this series of Red drive do at least make it look like the drives really are running at around 5400RPM, based on the power consumption being 53% of what the 7200RPM models use while active, while delivering 69% of the throughput at 75% of the speed. They don't claim they're in a "class" but perhaps they do ramp up to 5700RPM in reality, which ought to equate to even higher throughput so maybe they're still playing games with the term "RPM" and artificially limiting it. (The next two higher-capacity models actually run at a weird 5640RPM according to the spec sheet, which could get reported as 5700RPM, so I'd bet they're just using the same hardware and the lower models are artificially limited again.)