Canon imageRUNNER 8500 Quality

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

Does anyone have any experience with the Canon imageRUNNER 8500
(iR8500)? Does it produce nice crisp copies as the Xerox DocuTech,
which I do have experience with? I am interested in any feedback anyone
has regarding the Canon imageRUNNER 8500.

Thanks.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

ComputerSnack wrote:
> Does anyone have any experience with the Canon imageRUNNER 8500
> (iR8500)? Does it produce nice crisp copies as the Xerox DocuTech,
> which I do have experience with? I am interested in any feedback anyone
> has regarding the Canon imageRUNNER 8500.
>
> Thanks.
>

FWIW, I have an Imagerunnner 1630 (scanner/copier/printer), w/
presumably uses the same print/copy engine. Very nice copies, and lost
of adjustments, both auto and manual. I haven't hooked it up as a
printer yet, but see no reason to suppose its printing is any lower
quality than its copying.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

Wolf Kirchmeir wrote:
> FWIW, I have an Imagerunnner 1630 (scanner/copier/printer), w/
> presumably uses the same print/copy engine. Very nice copies, and
lost
> of adjustments, both auto and manual. I haven't hooked it up as a
> printer yet, but see no reason to suppose its printing is any lower
> quality than its copying.

Actually, the imageRUNNER 1630 is a 16 page per minute unit, whereas
the iR 8500 is an 85 ppm production unit, and are totally different. If
anyone has any comments regarding the iR8500 or iR105 or similar units,
let me know. Thanks.