Archived from groups: alt.games.civ3 (
More info?)
>> Well England did come up with a unique way of taking over Scotland when
>> military had failed.
>>
>> Have an English princess go marry a Scotish prince thats heir to the
>> Scotish throne, wait for them to have a kid that in turn becomes King
>> of Scotland, and then upon the death of the English king, invite the
>> Scotish King to come down to London and become King of England.
>>
>> China's way of aquiring inner mongolia was also unique. Allow a
>> Mongolian invader to conquer China and relocate.
>
>Good to be reminded. Not so very very unique, in fact. Think of the Greeks,
>that conquered most of the world they knew after being conquered by the
>Macedonians... and then a few centuries later were conquered by the Romans,
>took over them by culture ("Graecia capta ferum victorem caepit") and ended
>by dominating most of the richest and more advanced part of the world under
>the name of Eastern Roman Empire, from Byzantium...
>
>As usual, reality shows much more imagination than us mere gamers...
>
>Alfredo
>
And, of course, it was really the British who won the War of American
(so-called) Independence.
Lets' face it, most of the settlers were of British stock, who were facing a
bunch of Hanoverians. Can't have johnny-foreigner winning, eh? What? What?
------------------------------------------------------------
This post did not necessarily reflect my opinions. So there.
Pull the pins out to reply direct.