Christmas (and a slight rename) is coming!

[Mousemonkey]

http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20090819PD216.html [:mousemonkey:3]

 

[Shadow703793]

About time. Bit I like the "GTX" part tho 😛.

 

[Mousemonkey]

They better be good as well because unless they can pull some sort of magical bunny out of their corporate butthole Intel is lining up a big kick to the goolies that has nothing to do Larrabee per se. http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-10312275-64.html

 

[jerreece]

Just as long as the GeForce XXXX naming scheme is actually hierarchical. I don't want to see a GeForce 210 being faster than GeForce 215 or something stupid like that.

Let's home the renaming scheme is meant to actually make it easier on consumers. 😉

 

[JAYDEEJOHN]

Regarding this http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-10312275-64.html , I dont see much difference between that and physx, to be honest. The shoes on the other foot, its time to pay up
Tho, I think all these things should be accessible to any HW dev, and Im willing to change DRM to IRM heheh
Now, maybe people can see how AMD has been held back by Intel also
I say, make it illegal to prevent such crap, and then well see whos really taking risks

 

[Mousemonkey]

I for one have never been deluded about the feasibility of underhand tactics from any of the players in industry, but it was the comment

There is a lot of ways to skin the cat

that has me wondering what kind of stunt Nv is going to pull, Lucid chip anyone?

 

[JAYDEEJOHN]

That and the usage of opencl or cuda could do wonders

 

[4745454b]

I say meh. If it actually supports DX10.1 this is a new card, but that could be wrong. The way Nvidias been, this is most likely nothing more then a die shrink of G92. (with ofcourse yet ANOTHER new name.) Hopefully I'm wrong, but I don't see why all of a sudden they will release a new card, DX10.1, etc with DX11 cards coming out in the next 2-6months. I can see refreashing G92 at 40nm for cost savings, but not a new card.