Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.active_directory (
More info?)
Ken wrote:
> Can you have one generic account that people use - mainly to just term serv
> in to look at generally accessible documents - so as not to burn too many
> cals for casual users?
>
> "Mike Drechsler - SPAM PROTECTED EMAIL" wrote:
>
>
>>Claudio wrote:
>>
>>>We are about to upgrade our nt domain to Windows 2003 domain.
>>>We bought servers licesenses for all our production servers.
>>>My question is, do I need to purshase CALs for my users as well?
>>>Thanks
>>
>>Yes. That's the whole point.
>>Server license + CAL's for each user or device.
>>If you choose user, then you need to make sure each user in your
>>organization is given a unique login account to prevent confusion.
>>
>>The good news is that you don't need to buy CAL's for each server
>>separately. IE: 100 users with 2 servers requires 100CAL's not 200 (100
>>users for each server). Once that user or device has a CAL they can
>>connect to any Windows server at the version of the CAL or lower. So
>>buy the most recent version CAL (2003). I think they removed the
>>windows 2000 CALs from sale but if not make sure you always buy the
>>latest version even if you are using older servers.
>>
>>--
>>WARNING! Email address has been altered for spam resistance.
>>Please remove the -deletethispart-. section before replying directly.
>>Mike Drechsler (mike-newsgroup@-deletethispart-.upcraft.com)
>>
No.
--
WARNING! Email address has been altered for spam resistance.
Please remove the -deletethispart-. section before replying directly.
Mike Drechsler (mike-newsgroup@-deletethispart-.upcraft.com)
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram