Gee Bee :
most updates are non-destructive.
most will find it easier\quicker to do so from OS. One does not have to worry about cd's. usb sticks or whatever media your updating from.
There risks inherent in any firmware update, just like updating a bios in some respects.
I've always done this from OS, using the manufactures software, ocz toolbox for example for my vertex 4.
The only concern would be if the update was destructive, then you would of course find yourself re-installing OS.
Hi Gee Bee,
Maybe I'm just being thick, but the way you are explaining this, I don't see the difference. I agree with all of your premise points:
o Yes, there is some inherent risk
o Yes, these are almost always intended to be non-destructive
o Yes, it is easiest to use the OS tool instead of a boot CD or USB
o Yes, I almost always update using the OS tool or program provided by the vendor
I'm not sure that I understand how you make the assertion from these points that it is better to install an OS and then upgrade the firmware.
Re-reading the initial question, I wonder if the answer is really in two parts:
A. The question asks about installing a new SSD and then a clean OS. If I were doing a new build, then yes, I would put the whole thing together and then upgrade BIOS and firmware across the new system.
B. If I have an existing system and I'm upgrading, I'm personally more likely to install the new components and first confirm that they work. After confirming that all is operating correctly, I would then upgrade BIOS and firmware and then do the OS re-install.
In the case of scenario "A", you're building a new system, so the impact of a failure is very low.
In the case of scenario "B", I'd like to find out if my new component is working *before* I embark on an upgrade process. I feel like I minimize my risk if I install the hardware, upgrade, test, and then re-install the OS. If some part of the HW install/upgrade fails, then I can still use my machine until I get a replacement. If I jump straight into loading the new OS, then a failure would make my machine unusable until I get a replacement part and trouble-shoot the problem.
Of course, in either scenario, you will hit a point of no return, and that's where you have to rely on your backup. But I think that you covered that when you stated that there are always some inherent risks, be they firmware, BIOS, or other updates.
Gee, Bee, are we saying the same thing, just with different words, or is there a fundamental point that I'm missing, that makes it significantly, inherently *less* risky to jump into a new OS install on an existing machine ... and then update your firmware/BIOS? Seems like we're pretty close, and it may boil down to personal preference. Just want to make sure that I'm not missing something in your logic.
Thanks,
GorfTheFrog
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram