Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.dcameras,comp.graphics.apps.photoshop,rec.photo.digital,rec.photo.marketplace.digital,uk.rec.photo.adverts (
More info?)
In article <411a6f97$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com>, me@here.com wrote
>
>
> thanks for that Chuck
>
> Rich
> www.digitalmood.co.uk
>
> "Chuck Norris" <chuckie@shavemyback.com> wrote in message
> news:kh4ih0198edtoil375cdn4rv1p0fbguhih@4ax.com...
> > On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 20:26:33 +0100, "Rich" <me@here.com> wrote:
> >
> > >please take the time to visit www.digitalmood.co.uk
> > >
> > >have a look at my work - inparticular the more recent photos and let me
> know
> > >what you think
> > >
> > >leave any comments on my guestbook , or on this newsgroup
> > >
> > >thanks for your time
> > >
> > >Rich
> > >
> >
> > Well, okay, here goes.
> > I don't like the sites layout, asthetically anyway, but it is easy to
> > navigate, so if that's what you were going for, kudos.
> >
> > As to your photography, most of the pictures I really liked your
> > composition, camera angle, position, and/or cropping. What I noticed
> > though was the colors in many of the images, expecially landscape,
> > were washed out and dull, and some were very very hazy. A polarizer
> > filter can correct these issues, and perhaps a follow-up in PS of
> > hue/sat and unsharp mask. Hope that helps.
Site - loading - 7/10
Design - 5/10 - I hate large ad banners taking up
most of the screen which should be devoted to
photo's.
Animation - I prefer to determine what I see and for how long.
Content - Very little that is unusual, lacks inspiration to
others which is surely the point of a web site?
Quality of content - no argument.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram