Cooking Broken ?

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.games.everquest (More info?)

I've been mucking around with all the tradeskills, but I notice that
cooking is by far the most annoying.

It's just one long series of failures. When you get a new level of
items you can make the failure rate would have to have to be 8 out of
10. Your lucky to even be able to get the first bar done. Many times
i've seen an item fail completely and there items that I got two
levels ago still have never been able to be made "pristine".

Two things i've noticed:

My tradeskill spells for cooking are all red, even the starter ones,
and I am a level 19 provisioner.

My artistry skill is only 55/90. Why is it so low when all I do with
this guy is cook ?

Cheers,

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.games.everquest (More info?)

To be a provisioner you would have to be lvl 20 or above so I assume you are
a craftsmen, lvl 19.

The cooking skill is broken atm in that you dont get skill ups during the
process by using the appropriate trade buffs ( you do use them correct ?).
Only a chance for a skill up for finishing the product.

This problem is fixed on test and supposed to go in with the patch next
week.

Cladari - 68 druid EQ1, Quellious server
Middi - 21 provisioner EQ2, Permafrost server


"Fazza" <gjf_fazza@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7hius0dto35sv656t3dell41nuevs9tdf8@4ax.com...
> I've been mucking around with all the tradeskills, but I notice that
> cooking is by far the most annoying.
>
> It's just one long series of failures. When you get a new level of
> items you can make the failure rate would have to have to be 8 out of
> 10. Your lucky to even be able to get the first bar done. Many times
> i've seen an item fail completely and there items that I got two
> levels ago still have never been able to be made "pristine".
>
> Two things i've noticed:
>
> My tradeskill spells for cooking are all red, even the starter ones,
> and I am a level 19 provisioner.
>
> My artistry skill is only 55/90. Why is it so low when all I do with
> this guy is cook ?
>
> Cheers,
>