Courts to Test Using HP Tablets as Paper Replacement

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nice. Here in the US it would be slightly harder to implement however. Hard copies of each finding would be required. Plus there would be court cases challenging the devices' credibility due to them being electronic and easy to manipulate.
 
um, instead of giving the tablet with the document that you want, couldn't you make a simple delivery system and just send them the doc and have it show up on a recently received list over the local network?
 
[citation][nom]mcd023[/nom]um, instead of giving the tablet with the document that you want, couldn't you make a simple delivery system and just send them the doc and have it show up on a recently received list over the local network?[/citation]

Yeah, I mean in Star Trek, an Ensign gives a tablet to the Lieutenant officer instead of just sending it to the Lieutenant's tablet, which doesn't make much sense either. Shipping tablets around will be costly. I bet the cost to run the Turbolifts in the Enterprise D would be a lot lower.
 
[citation][nom]mcd023[/nom]um, instead of giving the tablet with the document that you want, couldn't you make a simple delivery system and just send them the doc and have it show up on a recently received list over the local network?[/citation]

[citation][nom]danwat1234[/nom]Yeah, I mean in Star Trek, an Ensign gives a tablet to the Lieutenant officer instead of just sending it to the Lieutenant's tablet, which doesn't make much sense either. Shipping tablets around will be costly. I bet the cost to run the Turbolifts in the Enterprise D would be a lot lower.[/citation]

The problem with this approach is the shift of focus that occurs. Each tablet is designated a certain function and that function only. If we were to use your Star Trek example, the Ensign is probably only uses the tablet for data and not for processing of said data. Utilizing the tablet for more than one purpose is usually what creates confusion. If we're talking computers, I have one machine for gaming and another for work. If I started doing work on my gaming computer, believe me when I say I would resort to gaming when I really should only be doing work.
 
This could be cooler and way faster. No longer will they have to pack up an envelope for your case and put it in a box for such and such a date then make sure that box isnt lost or left in the clerks office etc the day of the trial. This way the jury, lawyers, and judge can have all the docs and pics and so forth that they need at the swipe of a finger. It should make trials go much faster... of course now you'll need paper conversion to digital media but that shouldnt be a problem with those kodak 200ppm/400ipm color scanners they have now. Just export that to pdf and boom... trial in a file.
 
PC's were going to make things paperless. Then laptops were really going to make things paperless. The reason that neither of these 2 events made things paperless is that people like and want paper. As soon as a document is paperless, people start printing it out and filing it away so that they have a paper copy.
 
£1,000? (About $1,570 US, last I checked) Is that what TouchPads are up to on eBay now? 😛

In a more serious tone, I am curious to see what these are; chances are it's not TouchPads. Part of the price likely has to do with proprietary modifications in order to meed the security requirements demanded.

Also good to hear about this. I was getting kinda sick how the media would report every time some high-profile business would adopt iPads, (including, IIRC, a courthouse in the USA) but never mentioned it when any competitor's tablet got the same adoption.
 
Going to need a way to make sure that documents have not been modified since they were submitted. That's one of the functions of the Clerks of the Court here in New York; they have a copy of every legal document and hearing transcript. That copy is definitive.

Perhaps a checksum signed by an absolutely trustworthy time server? It's a difficult thing to make secure. Imagine if the judge ordered 20 years in the clink, and a hacker changed it to 2 hours of community service!
 
[citation][nom]WyomingKnott[/nom]Imagine if the judge ordered 20 years in the clink, and a hacker changed it to 2 hours of community service![/citation]

That can still happen today regardless of the paper copy. In my experience 99% of the time, once the paper copy is written/signed it disappears into oblivion. Ask your bank to produce the "ink signature" of your mortgage. Watch how many months it takes them to find it. This was a common trick for avoiding foreclosure.
 
iamtheking123

May be true of your bank, but I was specifically referring to court documents that are part of the record. These are not lost; I can walk into the Clerk's office, give an index number, and have the official originals put in front of me within ten minutes.

Forgery and alteration are still possible, but harder than if the official version resides on a tablet or a file server somewhere.
 
[citation][nom]WyomingKnott[/nom]Going to need a way to make sure that documents have not been modified since they were submitted. That's one of the functions of the Clerks of the Court here in New York; they have a copy of every legal document and hearing transcript. That copy is definitive. Perhaps a checksum signed by an absolutely trustworthy time server? It's a difficult thing to make secure. Imagine if the judge ordered 20 years in the clink, and a hacker changed it to 2 hours of community service![/citation]
Theres actually software that checks whether or not a file has been changed in any way I forget the name of it though.

@husker: with the cloud growing now that might change. More files available anywhere via a secure tunnel means wider adoption of the technology. When you can scribble down notes via a finger or stylus and have the handwriting recognized flawlessly people will abandon paper.
 
Soon they will be compromised with software to spy on court cases, and possible adjustment of court notes and transcriptions. Paper is much more tamper resistant and worth the extra cost.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.