CPU overclock to 4.6 Ghz

[Liquid-X]

I overclocked my 6700k to 4.6 Ghz, set vcore to 1.37, LLC at level 4, and current capacity at 120%, on the cpu-z, core volt is almost always at 1.36 v, should i lower anything

 

[SirFlamenco]

Everything looks fine. Oh and BTW, you good a pretty good overclocker

 

[MeanMachine41]

I overclocked my 6700k to 4.6 Ghz, set vcore to 1.37, LLC at level 4, and current capacity at 120%, on the cpu-z, core volt is almost always at 1.36 v, should i lower anything

That's a decent OC Liquid-X.

The level of Core voltage will determine your temperature on the Core.
If you need 1.37V for stability at 4.6GHz then that's fine. If temps are getting high 75C+ during stress testing then drop the Core voltage in small increments .01V till its unstable. Then raise it back up in small increments till stable. You can gain 5-6C or sometimes even more.

 

[Liquid-X]

Everything looks fine. Oh and BTW, you good a pretty good overclocker

really, how so

 

[SirFlamenco]

Everything looks fine. Oh and BTW, you good a pretty good overclocker

really, how so

4,6 ghz at 1,36v is not bad at all and you probably hit the silicon lottery. Well, ok if you have a custom loop this would be a pretty bad cpu, but I think you have a 212 evo - Am I right?

 

[Liquid-X]

Everything looks fine. Oh and BTW, you good a pretty good overclocker

really, how so

4,6 ghz at 1,36v is not bad at all and you probably hit the silicon lottery. Well, ok if you have a custom loop this would be a pretty bad cpu, but I think you have a 212 evo - Am I right?

no i got a kraken x62, is AIO, i can prob go higher with the cpu, right now temp is mostly only 55c mostly and 63 C max underload, which almost never hit, but I'm happy with 4.6 Ghz

 

[SirFlamenco]

Everything looks fine. Oh and BTW, you good a pretty good overclocker

really, how so

4,6 ghz at 1,36v is not bad at all and you probably hit the silicon lottery. Well, ok if you have a custom loop this would be a pretty bad cpu, but I think you have a 212 evo - Am I right?

no i got a kraken x62, is AIO, i can prob go higher with the cpu, right now temp is mostly only 55c mostly and 63 C max underload, which almost never hit, but I'm happy with 4.6 Ghz

What about prime 95?

 

[Liquid-X]

Everything looks fine. Oh and BTW, you good a pretty good overclocker

really, how so

4,6 ghz at 1,36v is not bad at all and you probably hit the silicon lottery. Well, ok if you have a custom loop this would be a pretty bad cpu, but I think you have a 212 evo - Am I right?

no i got a kraken x62, is AIO, i can prob go higher with the cpu, right now temp is mostly only 55c mostly and 63 C max underload, which almost never hit, but I'm happy with 4.6 Ghz

What about prime 95?

ran prime95 for hour and 20 min, temp was 74 C max

 

[SirFlamenco]

Everything looks fine. Oh and BTW, you good a pretty good overclocker

really, how so

4,6 ghz at 1,36v is not bad at all and you probably hit the silicon lottery. Well, ok if you have a custom loop this would be a pretty bad cpu, but I think you have a 212 evo - Am I right?

no i got a kraken x62, is AIO, i can prob go higher with the cpu, right now temp is mostly only 55c mostly and 63 C max underload, which almost never hit, but I'm happy with 4.6 Ghz

What about prime 95?

ran prime95 for hour and 20 min, temp was 74 C max

Oh well then your chip is average.. 75c at 4,6ghz is not very good. To return to your original question, no, everything is fine.

 

[Liquid-X]

Everything looks fine. Oh and BTW, you good a pretty good overclocker

really, how so

4,6 ghz at 1,36v is not bad at all and you probably hit the silicon lottery. Well, ok if you have a custom loop this would be a pretty bad cpu, but I think you have a 212 evo - Am I right?

no i got a kraken x62, is AIO, i can prob go higher with the cpu, right now temp is mostly only 55c mostly and 63 C max underload, which almost never hit, but I'm happy with 4.6 Ghz

What about prime 95?

ran prime95 for hour and 20 min, temp was 74 C max

Oh well then your chip is average.. 75c at 4,6ghz is not very good. To return to your original question, no, everything is fine.

alright thx, should i drop to 4.5 Ghz

 

[SirFlamenco]

Everything looks fine. Oh and BTW, you good a pretty good overclocker

really, how so

4,6 ghz at 1,36v is not bad at all and you probably hit the silicon lottery. Well, ok if you have a custom loop this would be a pretty bad cpu, but I think you have a 212 evo - Am I right?

no i got a kraken x62, is AIO, i can prob go higher with the cpu, right now temp is mostly only 55c mostly and 63 C max underload, which almost never hit, but I'm happy with 4.6 Ghz

What about prime 95?

ran prime95 for hour and 20 min, temp was 74 C max

Oh well then your chip is average.. 75c at 4,6ghz is not very good. To return to your original question, no, everything is fine.

alright thx, should i drop to 4.5 Ghz

If your temps are under 85c and you don't have any stability errors during stress test such as prime 95(24h no stop), you can consider your overclock as rock stable.

 

[Liquid-X]

Everything looks fine. Oh and BTW, you good a pretty good overclocker

really, how so

4,6 ghz at 1,36v is not bad at all and you probably hit the silicon lottery. Well, ok if you have a custom loop this would be a pretty bad cpu, but I think you have a 212 evo - Am I right?

no i got a kraken x62, is AIO, i can prob go higher with the cpu, right now temp is mostly only 55c mostly and 63 C max underload, which almost never hit, but I'm happy with 4.6 Ghz

What about prime 95?

ran prime95 for hour and 20 min, temp was 74 C max

Oh well then your chip is average.. 75c at 4,6ghz is not very good. To return to your original question, no, everything is fine.

alright thx, should i drop to 4.5 Ghz

If your temps are under 85c and you don't have any stability errors during stress test such as prime 95(24h no stop), you can consider your overclock as rock stable.

alright thx