CPU Stress Testing via IntelBurnTest/Prime95

AgentLOL

Reputable
Nov 16, 2014
229
0
4,690
So, I custom built a new PC, planning on stress testing the RAM/GPU later. I have a i5 4690, so it's 4 threads. So when I started up both of them (each one separately), in less than a minute, it shot above 80C. I'm using the Intel Stock Cooler, and I personally didn't build it (a person at Frys did it for me). I'm not sure what temps I should be at with this stock cooler. Someone help me before I randomly burn my CPU :fou::fou::fou::fou::fou::fou::fou::fou::fou::fou::fou::fou:
 
Solution


Yeah I don't currently own an Intel rig and even when I did I never tested it enough because I failed to need more performance than what it already provided. Having your CPU at 97-99C for 10-12...


How do I replace the stock cooler without damaging anything? Isn't it already glued with thermal paste? And if I do replace it, will the cooler master hyper 212 evo suffice?
 
Removing the stock cooler won't cause any damage(unless of course it's done improperly). There are plenty of guides on the net in this regard. Check with the people at Fry's if you don't feel comfortable(remind them you just bought the system from them) and perhaps they'll give you a break on the install.
 
Actually its normal because IntelBurnTest is very stressful, tested 20 runs and worked. The blend test from Prime95 isn't as stressful, so yeah. 77C on that. The intel stock cooler is fine, just not for 100% load, as that isn't very usual while gaming/most other things. If you're video recording, this definitely shouldn't be what ur doing though.

PS: For Furmark, my 1 Asus Strix GTX 970 goes no higher than 70C, hits it at 40% fan power, and 21 FPS on 8x MSAA. IS that usual powerful performance normal for a GTX 970? Never knew it was that powerful...
 


The Cooler Master 212 evo is a Great CPU Cooler. Removing the stock cooler won't hurt anything. I've had at least three coolers and I haven't had any problems.
 
Can't change my cooler, and I really will be just gaming. It has survived 20 runs, so is that enough for Intel Burn Test? And how long should I run Prime95 on what stress test (I only game no overclocks)
 
If you don't overclock then I don't see the point in running Prime95/IBT at all. I guess you can test for stability or for a bad batch but doesn't need to be that long. If you leave it 8-12 hours and P95 doesn't crash it will be pretty solid
 


It depends on what you want to do.( Since you're not going to OC )
If you want to use Intel Burn test I would suggest that you use a aftermarket cooler but since you're not going to change the CPU cooler I wouldn't use that program.
Some people use Prime95 for at least 8 hours or more, others use it for longer.
Enjoy the system and don't worry about OC.
 


Yeah, but leave all four cores 97-99C for 10 -12 hours? I don't exactly deem that safe. But is it safe? If it isn't, I think I'll be alright, having a CPU that passed 20 runs of IBT. Is it worth testing my RAM/HDD/SSD? Just asking, don't want my HDD or SSD or RAM failing me anytime soon...
 


Yeah I don't currently own an Intel rig and even when I did I never tested it enough because I failed to need more performance than what it already provided. Having your CPU at 97-99C for 10-12 hours is not safe in my opinion. If your CPU gets that hot with your stock heatsink I don't see it deemable to stress your CPU for instabilities. Enthusiasts seem to run their CPUs in the 80s-90C+ but they are overclocking while you are on stock settings. Testing your RAM for errors won't hurt. Just learn how to run Memtest86+ for your RAM. If it passes fully through without any errors it is safe to say the RAM is stable. HDD and SSD are a bit harder to test I guess. You can use windows to test storage drives I believe.
 
Solution