Greetings,
Iﾴm in a position where I have to choose between the aforementioned monitors, the Nokia one at 40ﾬ, the Sony one at 65ﾬ, without being able to examine either in advance (except when picking up my chosen monitor, I can naturally check it, but can´t compare - and I´m not an expert on image quality).
In any case, I need to choose whether itﾴs worth it to spend the extra 25ﾬ for the Sony, and decided to ask for advice from those more knowledgeable about the matter.
The pros on the Sony, as far as I can tell from the specs, are a .2" wider VIS and a reduced size (about 1" off all 3).
But obviously I don´t know about image quality...
Links:
Sony E530
Nokia 450Pro
Iﾴm in a position where I have to choose between the aforementioned monitors, the Nokia one at 40ﾬ, the Sony one at 65ﾬ, without being able to examine either in advance (except when picking up my chosen monitor, I can naturally check it, but can´t compare - and I´m not an expert on image quality).
In any case, I need to choose whether itﾴs worth it to spend the extra 25ﾬ for the Sony, and decided to ask for advice from those more knowledgeable about the matter.
The pros on the Sony, as far as I can tell from the specs, are a .2" wider VIS and a reduced size (about 1" off all 3).
But obviously I don´t know about image quality...
Links:
Sony E530
Nokia 450Pro
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram