Crucial SSD BX100 or BX200



The new NAND is cheaper to manufacture, and at some point the BX200 will (probably) sell for lower prices per GB than the BX100 ever could. Still, the BX200 seems like a mistake. Sacrificing a bit of performance for lower prices is arguably fine, but the BX200 is too big of a step backwards. Crucial should probably have waited for 3D NAND.
 


Yes. 3D TLC, that is. 3D improves the durability and performance, negating the drawbacks of using TLC. It's an excellent SSD.

The BX200 uses planar (2D) TLC. Obviously that didn't work out so well.

Samsung's old 840 Evo also used planar TLC, and although its performance initially looked fine, it did end up suffering from performance degradation on older stored data.