[SOLVED] CrystalDisk test don't match promised numbers

[Onur3]

I just bought Seagate Baraccuda and tested with CrystalDisk. Here is results
https://ibb.co/vwNX2RK
but this website says it should be 560 for read and write
https://www.storagereview.com/review/seagate-barracuda-ssd-review
does my ssd broken? Should I return it?

 

[mdd1963]

The size of the files being read/written greatly impacts the speeds, and, anything else going on in the background could partially drag down numbers a tad...

IMO, it looks fine. Not every system is going to read exactly the advertised read/write numbers in every benchmark...

 

[USAFRet]

I just bought Seagate Baraccuda and tested with CrystalDisk. Here is results
https://ibb.co/vwNX2RK
but this website says it should be 560 for read and write
https://www.storagereview.com/review/seagate-barracuda-ssd-review
does my ssd broken? Should I return it?

The numbers at your link are theoretical best, in lab conditions, reported by the manufacturer.
Sequential numbers of 500+ in your actual testing is well within the margin of error.

There is nothing to "fix".

 

[Onur3]

Thank you, I am new at this but you really helped