csccmd version 1.1 and offline files

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.file_system (More info?)

Hello All,

I have been researching the Sync Manager and offline files and have
discovered
very little about how to manipulate the repository. From this I gather that
MS does not want us to mess with it. However, I have a requirement to do so.

I have read and understand that the command line tool csccmd.exe has a new
version which I have tried to get and it is basically impossible. Where can
i get it?

On another note if customers want better synchronization than currently
provided by the OS then I am assuming it needs to be a proprietary
implementation that does not use the CSC repository.

~mike
 
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.file_system (More info?)

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;884739

Call PSS and reference the above KB - they should supply you with the tool.

Unfortunately XP/2k Offline Files has no public API, so you're limited in
what you can do.

Windows Vista Offline Files has been completely rewritten, will include a
fully documented API for controlling behaviour.

Tom Jolly
--
Development Lead
Windows Vista Offline Files / CSC feature

** This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. **



"Mike Cop" <MikeCop@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:42FB1FE5-256E-4E9E-B114-99A6C7C4100C@microsoft.com...
> Hello All,
>
> I have been researching the Sync Manager and offline files and have
> discovered
> very little about how to manipulate the repository. From this I gather
> that
> MS does not want us to mess with it. However, I have a requirement to do
> so.
>
> I have read and understand that the command line tool csccmd.exe has a new
> version which I have tried to get and it is basically impossible. Where
> can
> i get it?
>
> On another note if customers want better synchronization than currently
> provided by the OS then I am assuming it needs to be a proprietary
> implementation that does not use the CSC repository.
>
> ~mike
>