To experienced water cooling folks:
I have a EKWB custom loop kit, EK-KIT X240, and also an Arctic Freezer 240 All-In-One liquid cooler. I compared them with the same CPU (i7 7700K, no-overclocking) using the same thermal compound. I was doing CPU only cooling.
Testing with Prime 95, small FFT option, the EK-kit reached 81 C while the Arctic Freezer AIO stayed at 72 C.
I am very puzzled by this result. The only advantage that the Arctic Freezer AIO has is the number of fans: 4 vs EK's 2 fans. But I hear that the number of fans do not make much difference. On the other hand, the EK kit has a thicker radiator (60 mm vs 38 mm of Arctic Freezer, both are 240mm radiators), and a stronger pump, so it should outperform the AIO.
I would like to find out why the temperature difference is so large, or if there is anything wrong with my EK kit, before I further invest in custom water cooling.
I have a EKWB custom loop kit, EK-KIT X240, and also an Arctic Freezer 240 All-In-One liquid cooler. I compared them with the same CPU (i7 7700K, no-overclocking) using the same thermal compound. I was doing CPU only cooling.
Testing with Prime 95, small FFT option, the EK-kit reached 81 C while the Arctic Freezer AIO stayed at 72 C.
I am very puzzled by this result. The only advantage that the Arctic Freezer AIO has is the number of fans: 4 vs EK's 2 fans. But I hear that the number of fans do not make much difference. On the other hand, the EK kit has a thicker radiator (60 mm vs 38 mm of Arctic Freezer, both are 240mm radiators), and a stronger pump, so it should outperform the AIO.
I would like to find out why the temperature difference is so large, or if there is anything wrong with my EK kit, before I further invest in custom water cooling.