Archived from groups: uk.rec.shooting.game (
More info?)
In article <Xns95759A6E6F676OEcopyremovedheaders@130.133.1.4>, John
<zero_one34@hotmail.com> writes
>Malcolm <Malcolm@indaal.demon.co.uk> wrote in
>news:lTqMUfd1kVXBFwSG@indaal.demon.co.uk:
>
>>
>> In article <415d1f43$0$29905$cc9e4d1f@news.dial.pipex.com>,
>SimonSX
>> <Simonuk_behappy@yahoo.co.uk> writes
>>
>>>what is the danger of lead poisoning due to eating lead shot
>in shot
>>>game???
>>>
>> If you were listening to the R4 report this morning about
>the banning
>> of lead shot (at long last, hurrah!) from being used at
>Scottish
>> wetlands and wondering if you might suffer the same fate as
>the
>> ducks, you need have no fear. The reason they get lead
>poisoning is
>> that the lead pellets are ground up in their gizzard, along
>with the
>> plants, seeds, etc. that they've been eating and the lead
>then gets
>> absorbed through the walls of the gut and into the blood
>stream. As
>> you lack a gizzard and the hydrochloric acid in your stomach
>isn't
>> strong enough to act on the lead it will pass straight
>through you
>> untouched. Recycling, anyone?
>
>I would be very interested in *any* solid scientific research
>you could provide to prove that the ducks are being adversely
>effected and poisoned by lead shot.
>Can you do this?
>
Yes, of course. There's an extensive literature on the subject based on
solid scientific research. I can send you some titles if you wish.
The evidence has been sufficient to convince the authorities in England
and Wales, the USA, Canada, Denmark, the Netherlands, Belgium, Norway,
Sweden, Finland and Australia, to ban it either completely or partially.
I somehow doubt they all would have done that had there not been solid
scientific evidence of adverse effects such as deaths by poisoning.
The following extracts are from the BASC website:
"There is NO DOUBT [their emphasis] that some waterfowl are poisoned by
lead gunshot in this country. There is abundant evidence of lead shot
inside gizzards, toxic lead levels in vital organs and recorded deaths
in the field. Scientific studies have been published in the 1960s, 70s
and 80s.
The total number of waterfowl that die from lead poisoning cannot easily
be estimated. It is not large but this loss (avoidable waste) is not
what can be considered wise use of our quarry species. The shooting
organisations have long recognised this and agreed we should act
responsibly by using lead alternatives."
To my mind, BASC have indeed acted responsibly over the long period of
discussion and consultation about banning the use of lead shot. They
were, for example, insistent that suitable alternatives had to be found
before any ban was instituted, and also worked hard to achieve a
voluntary ban well before the legal ban was brought in.
--
Malcolm